|
Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule
I think an interesting choice is going to be Batiste/M. Williams, at least one of them needs to be active in case a Tackle goes down. Whichever one is kept active will say alot about the coaches opinion of the other.
As to Jarmon and Mitchell, I think they want to keep Mitchell active, but like I said the 45 man roster is somewhat limiting.
No one has yet taken a shot at explaining why the 8 man difference between roster, and active. All 53 get game checks don't they? So can anyone tell me what the CBA logic was to limiting the roster to 45?
|
I would be glad to tell you...if I knew. It makes zero sense to me. I also would like to see the roster expanded to 58 instead of 53.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
|