Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow

CRedskinsRule · 09-13-2009, 09:51 AM

I think an interesting choice is going to be Batiste/M. Williams, at least one of them needs to be active in case a Tackle goes down. Whichever one is kept active will say alot about the coaches opinion of the other.

As to Jarmon and Mitchell, I think they want to keep Mitchell active, but like I said the 45 man roster is somewhat limiting.

No one has yet taken a shot at explaining why the 8 man difference between roster, and active. All 53 get game checks don't they? So can anyone tell me what the CBA logic was to limiting the roster to 45?

09-13-2009, 09:51 AM	#19
CRedskinsRule Living Legend Join Date: Aug 2008 Age: 59 Posts: 21,744	Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow I think an interesting choice is going to be Batiste/M. Williams, at least one of them needs to be active in case a Tackle goes down. Whichever one is kept active will say alot about the coaches opinion of the other. As to Jarmon and Mitchell, I think they want to keep Mitchell active, but like I said the 45 man roster is somewhat limiting. No one has yet taken a shot at explaining why the 8 man difference between roster, and active. All 53 get game checks don't they? So can anyone tell me what the CBA logic was to limiting the roster to 45?

Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow

Locker Room Main Forum