Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


WP sums it up

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-07-2004, 12:32 PM   #16
Gmanc711
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by monk81
On ESPN this morning, Mike Ditka said that Joe is a winner and will be a winner again, the Redskin defense has been #1 or #2 ranked in the NFL......He couldn't put his finger on why the offense had problems scoring, but mentioned perhaps a QB change should be made......hmmmmmmmmm Is Mike reading this board or perhaps talking to some of y'all on this Forum?
No, hes always been a master of the obvious.
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-07-2004, 12:44 PM   #17
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
If the offensive line continues to allow the defense to flush Brunell out of the pocket in max protection, Coach Gibbs will continue to make the argument that the offense is not Brunell's fault. And rightfully so. Can you imagine what will happen if Ramsey comes into the game with this kind of inconsistency from our line? I'll tell you. Sack after sack after sack. Let's hope Brunell can pull out a win and continue to win until Ramsey truly understands how to read the defense and scramble when neccessary.

Brunell was sacked 5 times last week and he was clearly not comfortable most of the time in the pocket.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 01:25 PM   #18
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by DragoJT87
Ramsey has seen worse from defenses last year with worse protection and no RB. I would hardly call this years situation "the wolves". By the way, isn't putting someone in at the end of the 3rd quarter and down by 13 points, allbeit because of injury, throwing someone to the wolves. What's your take on giving him a full start so he does not have to try and win the game on every throw, which by the way he almost did? He is one Rod Gardner drop at the goaline from us all being silent.
What I mean by throwing him to the wolves is putting him in a situation where he can only fail.

The team is 2-5, they're suffering from breakdowns in protection, and the WR's and QB's aren't on the same page yet.

Putting him in would be setting him up for failure in my opinion. And the last thing he needs is to take another beating and keep making the same mistakes because he'll be forcing the issue to try to help the team rebound.

Putting someone in the game due to injury is an entirely different story. What else can you do? You have to put him in then.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 01:29 PM   #19
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Check out the Doc Walker interview over at extremeskins. He makes some good points about Brunell, about how he's just a few plays here and there away, he also points out the WR's dropping alot of balls earlier this year and that definitely wasn't his fault. And he also makes the point of mentioning Brunell is feeling the heat from the pass rush too often.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 01:37 PM   #20
monk81
The Starter
 
monk81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,029
After the year Ramsey had with Spurrier......spending most of the time eating turf....
imagine the young guy coming into another year when the protection from the line once again ain't so stellar and again he gets pummeled.....perhaps Joe is thinking in terms of Ramsey's psyche and having him experiencing a total lack of confidence and Ramsey becoming shell shocked on the field............
monk81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 01:57 PM   #21
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by monk81
After the year Ramsey had with Spurrier......spending most of the time eating turf....
imagine the young guy coming into another year when the protection from the line once again ain't so stellar and again he gets pummeled.....perhaps Joe is thinking in terms of Ramsey's psyche and having him experiencing a total lack of confidence and Ramsey becoming shell shocked on the field............

Yes and no, our protection last year was just abysmal, the protection this year is much better than last year we may not set any record's but Ramsey was able to succeed with absolutly no protection, I believe he could survive with the protection he would be recieving now if he played.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 02:03 PM   #22
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Saying the protection is better than last year isn't saying much.

It's definitely not to the level that Gibbs wants and expects, that's for sure.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.00501 seconds with 12 queries