|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2? | |||
Yes | 193 | 91.47% | |
No | 18 | 8.53% | |
Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-11-2012, 01:04 PM | #646 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,385
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Quote:
|
|
Advertisements |
03-11-2012, 01:17 PM | #647 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 55
Posts: 3,803
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
|
03-11-2012, 01:23 PM | #648 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Quote:
2 first rounders + a 2nd rounder + 2013 1st and 2nd rounders? Yes, I would make that trade. Last edited by 30gut; 03-11-2012 at 01:25 PM. |
|
03-11-2012, 01:41 PM | #649 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Quote:
|
|
03-11-2012, 01:59 PM | #650 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 55
Posts: 3,803
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Watch HIGHLIGHT film of this guy (RG3) and you won't make that deal IMO. Meaning we would NOT trade back with cleveland to #4.
|
03-11-2012, 02:34 PM | #651 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Will some of you feel better if we package our 3rd and 4th to move back up into the 2nd? We'd still have 4th, 5th, 6th and at least one 7th.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
03-11-2012, 02:49 PM | #652 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
i feel fine about where we stand
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
03-11-2012, 03:08 PM | #653 |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Is anyone else feeling the sticker shock of the Griffin deal wearing off and pure joy arising from having a stud QB?
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
03-11-2012, 03:08 PM | #654 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
I'm thinking no. I think RG3 was worth risking letting go of McCoy or pissing him off drafting his perceived replacement. I'm not so sure if Tannehill is worth the gamble, when one could argue that McCoy is a couple supporting cast members of being a better than average QB. That's how I see it, anyways.
I know I am. This is the most hopeful I've felt in more than a decade. Last edited by PaulieG; 03-11-2012 at 03:11 PM. |
03-11-2012, 03:09 PM | #655 |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
If things somehow shook out that we could move up to get Mike Adams in the 2nd, I'd go for that.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
03-11-2012, 03:10 PM | #656 |
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,167
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Never had the sticker shock in the first place.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
03-11-2012, 03:17 PM | #657 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Quote:
I don't know if I ever had sticker shock because the team had never convinced me it knew what it was doing before. So I wasn't like WHOA WHERE DID THOSE CAJONES COME FROM?!?!?! It was consistent with what we had seen from the Redskins before. My first emotion when word of the trade was joy, and then the joy faded when it became obvious that the Redskins didn't pull of a great deal or better their team or anything. They just cashed in their chips in what I would call a calculated, though impatient, manner. Free agency was always going to define the quality of their offseason IMO. So I'm definitely still taking a wait and see approach to grading this offseason because we don't know how well they've set the team up for the future yet.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
03-11-2012, 03:46 PM | #658 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 267
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Quote:
Also, I have no photoshop skills, so it'll be a while before I get banned. |
|
03-11-2012, 03:46 PM | #659 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Oh, man that was good.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
03-11-2012, 04:00 PM | #660 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Quote:
Last edited by PaulieG; 03-11-2012 at 04:33 PM. |
|
|
|