Quote:
Originally Posted by railcon56@comcast.net
This was a great offensive team that had a lot of weapons it wasn't Brunell he could barely execute this offense... Everybody says he did so well.... He had Portis, Cooley, and Moss Plenty of weapons.... But every pass that was over 10 yards to Moss was a brilliant amazing catch by Moss ....all of the TD's were screens or Moss breaking it big.... What about San Diego and the Raiders when Brunell had horrible games... there were many times commentators noted ....that guy was wide open over the middle.... I saw 1 pass over the middle that was thrown deeper than 10 yard by Brunell in the last 8 games that was the Pass to Cooley Saturday......but I also saw many times Cooley was open when they needed 5 yard when Brunell couldn’t get set he had to run back 10 yards... Offiss is right if we had a descent Qb this team had enough talent with the offense to go 12-4 or even better.... Brunell did the best he could..... But that’s not enough....... Everybody said to me at work you don’t seem upset they lost Rail.... and I was but I knew before the Seattle game if we started Brunell the Skin's had a 10% chance at best to win..... You can't beat a good team especially in the playoffs scoring 10 points....... So Do I want old marshmallow armed, Gimp to be gone damn right I do....And Ramsey has proven he can take a shot and throw the ball.... But because brunell throws a great 10 yard pass and was the benefactor of a great defensive team he's god's gift to Qb’s.....read the times article about can brunell get us there....NO F_ckin WAY!!!! Keep Ramsey who knows the offense and Campbell.....
|
You have to judge Brunell by his entire season, not just what you saw in the past three weeks, AFTER he was injured. If doing so, you'd see Brunell is not only a capable quarterback, but the best choice.