What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

[backrow]

Originally Posted by JWsleep

It's odd in this case becuase apparently the post's sources were Taylor's lawyers. Maybe they're surprised that Sean is in DC? Or maybe they said Sean will be in FLA for the trial, so he won't be at OTAs, meaning: When the trial is on, Sean will obviously be here. But otherwise, not.

Whatever the mix up, skins.com are super happy to point it out!

It's nice to have mulitple sources--the Post has been weak lately, but no doubt at some point they'll have something that the skins don't want us to know. My attitude is great, the more info I can get, the better. How else am I gonna waste my time in the offseason?

What I like about the Washpost article: "believes the defense has a strong case"

"Sharpstein said he expects Taylor to be at Redskins Park by late April -- offseason organized team activity practices likely will not begin until May -- and believes the defense has a strong case. The case has been continued several times since September, but Sharpstein said he expects it will go to trial as scheduled next month.