Redskins Training Camp Thread 3.0

[JoeRedskin]

In the return game, I just want a guy who (1) makes good decisions inside the 10; (2) secures the ball; and (3) runs forward. With our offense, anything we get in the return game is a bonus. On PR's it would be nice to have a threat but 1-3 above more critical to me. KR is pretty much a non-issue given the number of TB's. Again, a threat would be nice but simply not critical.

Secure the ball. Move Foward. RGIII & Co. will take it from there.

[artmonkforhallofamein07]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

In the return game, I just want a guy who (1) makes good decisions inside the 10; (2) secures the ball; and (3) runs forward. With our offense, anything we get in the return game is a bonus. On PR's it would be nice to have a threat but 1-3 above more critical to me. KR is pretty much a non-issue given the number of TB's. Again, a threat would be nice but simply not critical.

Secure the ball. Move Foward. RGIII & Co. will take it from there.

winner winner chicken dinner

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

In the return game, I just want a guy who (1) makes good decisions inside the 10; (2) secures the ball; and (3) runs forward. With our offense, anything we get in the return game is a bonus. On PR's it would be nice to have a threat but 1-3 above more critical to me. KR is pretty much a non-issue given the number of TB's. Again, a threat would be nice but simply not critical.

Secure the ball. Move Foward. RGIII & Co. will take it from there.

Agreed. Hence the concern about the explosive Thompson. It's just a matter of time before he puts the ball on the ground...again.

[Green Monk Machine]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

In the return game, I just want a guy who (1) makes good decisions inside the 10; (2) secures the ball; and (3) runs forward. With our offense, anything we get in the return game is a bonus. On PR's it would be nice to have a threat but 1-3 above more critical to me. KR is pretty much a non-issue given the number of TB's. Again, a threat would be nice but simply not critical.

Secure the ball. Move Foward. RGIII & Co. will take it from there.

That's all we need. Kickoffs are hardly going to be returnable but if they are, let Paul get it to the 20-25. The offense can move the ball. Just keep it secured.

Crawford was our PR and helped win the Raven game but if we need a spark, it wouldn't be a difficult to have Moss back there.

Thompson should not be back there at all unless we are winning big and give him chances to get some game experience.

If Paul really is the 4th TE, then I vote him to be the KR, PR, and punt coverage ace.

Hopefully, Dawson is on PS for next year Return competition.