Redskins Offseason Thread

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

No doubt and I'm not saying no to a DT but at 13? That is pretty high, he better be the next Suh or Donald. LG/DT however u spin it, those are our biggest needs

I would say DT/RB/LG.

I also think all 3 can be addressed effectively in the draft. My main disagreement with some here is that FA was the way to address the line. I would rather take 2-3 lineman in the draft, + 1 or 2 undrafted guys, and see what shakes out, rather than look for other teams castaways in FA

(although I'm still open to a Hankins or CJ Anderson signing at the right price)

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

I would say DT/RB/LG.

I also think all 3 can be addressed effectively in the draft. My main disagreement with some here is that FA was the way to address the line. I would rather take 2-3 lineman in the draft, + 1 or 2 undrafted guys, and see what shakes out, rather than look for other teams castaways in FA

(although I'm still open to a Hankins or CJ Anderson signing at the right price)

I dont know of any lineman really available still? I haven't looked in a while. Yes draft we need to address all 3 for sure, and probably a CB at some point as well. Norman isn't young anymore and scandrick is a 1 year guy.

[DYoungJelly]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

I would say DT/RB/LG.

I also think all 3 can be addressed effectively in the draft. My main disagreement with some here is that FA was the way to address the line. I would rather take 2-3 lineman in the draft, + 1 or 2 undrafted guys, and see what shakes out, rather than look for other teams castaways in FA

(although I'm still open to a Hankins or CJ Anderson signing at the right price)

I would add fast twitch edge guy who scares tackles is another need.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk