Coaching and Front Office Changes

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Riverboat is doing the right thing not handing the job over to O'Connell...that woulda been a "Bruce"-like demand. Let Ron take his time and assemble the staff the way he wants, I have a feeling both KOC and Scott Turner could be on staff

+1

I only want KOC if Rivera wants him. But acting like KOC hasn't done jack or is a no-name is completely ignoring all evidence to the contrary.

I also welcome Scott Turner if Rivera wants him too. I want Rivera to have a staff that is fully on board with his plan.

[SFREDSKIN]

Good new article by JP regarding KOC

https://www.nbcsports.com/washington...ers-son-report

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by mooby

+1

I only want KOC if Rivera wants him. But acting like KOC hasn't done jack or is a no-name is completely ignoring all evidence to the contrary.

I also welcome Scott Turner if Rivera wants him too. I want Rivera to have a staff that is fully on board with his plan.

No one is saying he hasn't done jack - just that he hasn't done anything to deserve being handed an OC position.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

No one is saying he hasn't done jack - just that he hasn't done anything to deserve being handed an OC position.

I want to assume I'm reading this wrong, because it reads like you think KOC was promoted to OC and then playcaller even though he didn't do anything to deserve being promoted.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mooby

I want to assume I'm reading this wrong, because it reads like you think KOC was promoted to OC and then playcaller even though he didn't do anything to deserve being promoted.

I think the point was that with a new, better, staff coming in, KOC's limited experience doesn't qualify as an automatic pass on going through the interview and evaluation process. If KOC impresses we all hope that Rivera will make his choice on those basis' not whether KOC was a golden child here before, or Scott Turner was his OC in Carolina.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[mooby]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

I think the point was that with a new, better, staff coming in, KOC's limited experience doesn't qualify as an automatic pass on going through the interview and evaluation process. If KOC impresses we all hope that Rivera will make his choice on those basis' not whether KOC was a golden child here before, or Scott Turner was his OC in Carolina.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Just so we're clear, I am in no way promoting the idea that KOC deserves to be Rivera's OC because he was Jay Gruden's OC.

If Rivera likes KOC and thinks he will be fine running the offense, bring him back.

If Rivera likes Bill Callahan's 1940's 80 runs a game offense better than KOC's, bring Callahan back.

The decision is Rivera's. I want complete coaching cohesion more than I want any one assistant coach. We absolutely could not afford to have KOC on staff if he went out and taught concepts that Rivera conflicted with.

[metalskins]

Originally Posted by mooby

Just so we're clear, I am in no way promoting the idea that KOC deserves to be Rivera's OC because he was Jay Gruden's OC.

If Rivera likes KOC and thinks he will be fine running the offense, bring him back.

If Rivera likes Bill Callahan's 1940's 80 runs a game offense better than KOC's, bring Callahan back.

The decision is Rivera's. I want complete coaching cohesion more than I want any one assistant coach. We absolutely could not afford to have KOC on staff if he went out and taught concepts that Rivera conflicted with.

And that's why I think Rivera moves on from KOC. I think he wants to know he's got the coaches on his staff who are all going to be one the same page. I have no problem with that. As long as it's Rivera making the decisions.