Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The Haskins Threat 2.0

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Your opinion on Haskins heading into next season?
Promising, he looks like he could be a player 43 72.88%
Still on the fence 15 25.42%
He's a bust 1 1.69%
Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-07-2020, 05:46 PM   #1
Ohioskins
Special Teams
 
Ohioskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dublin, Ohio
Posts: 328
Re: The Haskins Threat 2.0

Yeah, take Tua with the Number 2 pick and when he breaks like a China doll after a few big NFL hits ( and with our offensive line, those hits ARE coming), then see where you are. What a stupid idea, take an injury prone QB witht he Number 2 pick when you already have a QB from your use of your first round pick last year. Thank goodness you are not in our front office.
Ohioskins is offline  
Old 04-07-2020, 07:25 PM   #2
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
Re: The Haskins Threat 2.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohioskins View Post
Yeah, take Tua with the Number 2 pick and when he breaks like a China doll after a few big NFL hits ( and with our offensive line, those hits ARE coming), then see where you are. What a stupid idea, take an injury prone QB witht he Number 2 pick when you already have a QB from your use of your first round pick last year. Thank goodness you are not in our front office.
To be fair he's only had 1 season of injuries and that was this yr. I think hes as good as Burrow or better but we need so much that drafting tua won't help. I'd be happy with chase but I'd be thrilled with more picks. We aren't competing this year, let's all face it so stock up picks and build

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline  
Old 04-08-2020, 10:00 AM   #3
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 37
Posts: 14,189
Re: The Haskins Threat 2.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
To be fair he's only had 1 season of injuries and that was this yr. I think hes as good as Burrow or better but we need so much that drafting tua won't help. I'd be happy with chase but I'd be thrilled with more picks. We aren't competing this year, let's all face it so stock up picks and build

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
He got hurt last year also with his other ankle and had surgery on his hand, and then this year blew his hip out on a hit that wasn't even hard.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline  
Old 04-07-2020, 08:23 PM   #4
rocnrik
Playmaker
 
rocnrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,877
Re: The Haskins Threat 2.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohioskins View Post
Yeah, take Tua with the Number 2 pick and when he breaks like a China doll after a few big NFL hits ( and with our offensive line, those hits ARE coming), then see where you are. What a stupid idea, take an injury prone QB witht he Number 2 pick when you already have a QB from your use of your first round pick last year. Thank goodness you are not in our front office.
Okay expert ...
rocnrik is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.17487 seconds with 12 queries