Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The Haskins Threat 2.0

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Your opinion on Haskins heading into next season?
Promising, he looks like he could be a player 43 72.88%
Still on the fence 15 25.42%
He's a bust 1 1.69%
Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-05-2020, 04:59 PM   #11
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,584
Re: The Haskins Threat 2.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohioskins View Post
DH would not take it well because he will have worked his ass off to be the best he can be and will be upset if that is not good enough. Any competitive athlete would feel the same way. I am just amazed at how many Skins fans seem to want to see him fail.

He is an excellent Quarterback. People seem to forget he beat out Joe Burrow fair and square in 2018 to earn the starting QB position at OSU. And his 2018 stats dwarfed Burrows' numbers that year.
Doesn't mean anything because Burrow obviously got a lot better. Burrow hadn't fully developed as he was a basketball player in high school. Urban Meyer had mentioned this in an interview.

But I'm rooting for Haskins big time. But he seems to be a little thin skinned and cares what people think about him. Can't be that way if you want to be a great QB. Dude needs to stay off Twitter.
skinsfan69 is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.29368 seconds with 12 queries