![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: University of South Carolina
Age: 37
Posts: 577
|
Re: Defensive Failures: Scheme or Players?
Quote:
Ok we lack CB's so we should drop the safties back to help But then we lack LB's and DL's so we need to keep the safties in to stop the run. Quite the pickle you would have to scheme from that.
__________________
University Of South Carolina '11 Go Cocks and Go Skins #21#RIP Sean Taylor a TRUE Redskin#21# <--Hey wheres my green approval rating? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Defensive Failures: Scheme or Players?
Quote:
But it's not a unique pickle in the NFL. Coaches change and adapt with the talent they have. Plain and simple. Listen, even if we get a stud in the first round, what are the chances of the kid getting on the field at the start of the season. Slim to none, it goes against Gregg Williams' style. Keep an eye on the defensive rookies of the year and ask yourself if this guy were a Redskin, would he have started and had that same impact within our system? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nashville,TN
Age: 52
Posts: 474
|
Re: Defensive Failures: Scheme or Players?
Intelligence is the ability to make adjustments. GW had to change the D because of the players. PERIOD. The injury bug hit starting with Pierson P, Springs etc.. Those players were key to the D's overall success. Other players then had to do things they weren't used to doing(i.e. Kenny Wright starting). When we had the players, the scheme was great. We just gotta get more players.
__________________
BEWARE THE MIDDLE............LaRON LANDRY IS LURKING! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 684
|
Re: Defensive Failures: Scheme or Players?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nashville,TN
Age: 52
Posts: 474
|
Re: Defensive Failures: Scheme or Players?
Quote:
__________________
BEWARE THE MIDDLE............LaRON LANDRY IS LURKING! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 61
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: Defensive Failures: Scheme or Players?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,591
|
Re: Defensive Failures: Scheme or Players?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Defensive Failures: Scheme or Players?
Quote:
Furthermore, the Giants nearly crashed and burned without Strahan this year. It's not like they cruised into the playoffs without him. They backed their way in by the slimmest of margins.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Defensive Failures: Scheme or Players?
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Defensive Failures: Scheme or Players?
i agree, but wouldn't the secondary look alot better right now with Harris?
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Defensive Failures: Scheme or Players?
It's all hindsight now, but I remember thinking there was legitimate debate as to whether linebacker was the bigger issue for the '06 draft or cornerback.
I think it's perfectly reasonable to say that Shawn Springs was nearing the end of his career, that Carlos Rogers was a big question mark, and one more push for top-knotch talent in the secondary was needed. I was all for the Kenny Wright move. I thought he'd be perfect in the nickel position, and was a solid pickup after noting his 15 game starting history in Jacksonville last year. So no one could have predicted his demise after being thrust into the position of starting corner. Rumph, Vincent, and Fox were all desperation moves. At that point, the secondary was already a cluster-fornication and anyone would have been an improvement over the current lot. Either way, the front office has to be accountable at some point. Sooner or later, some of us are going to have to stop grasping at straws to defend these people and start calling it for what it is -- a dismal failure. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|