Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Do you approve of the trade for Jason Taylor?
Yes 195 91.98%
No 17 8.02%
Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-20-2008, 07:02 PM   #1
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

The 6th is almost valueless, just a throw in deal, but Miami really made out on us with the 2nd. I mean, if Daniels doesn't go down, they either have to settle for a 4th from someone else, or just hold on to him for this season.

This is almost as nice for them as getting a 2nd for Chris Chambers. Not quite that good, but close.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 07:06 PM   #2
GridIron26
Playmaker
 
GridIron26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Age: 37
Posts: 3,743
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Just like some people, I think 2nd rd is kinda too much.. Also JT would be playing as left end, hope it will be a smooth change.. But there's nothing we can do but to hope the best out of this deal.. (I hope he will play more than a yr)
GridIron26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 07:06 PM   #3
EXoffender
The Starter
 
EXoffender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 1,046
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
The 6th is almost valueless, just a throw in deal, but Miami really made out on us with the 2nd. I mean, if Daniels doesn't go down, they either have to settle for a 4th from someone else, or just hold on to him for this season.

This is almost as nice for them as getting a 2nd for Chris Chambers. Not quite that good, but close.
Chambers or Taylor? I'd take Jason Talyor please. How productive has he been for the last few years?
EXoffender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 07:14 PM   #4
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

A 2nd sounds like a lot to me based on what's been reported previously about other teams' interest. Never know though, Vinny might have had some good intel that somebody else was offering a 3rd & something else, so he had to up the offer.

Terrible that Daniels went down, but in one day this really improves our D. I give props to Danny & Vinny for acting w/lightening speed on this after losing 2 DEs in 1 day.

Also, we never know if this deal was in the works before Daniels was hurt, but if Daniels' injury was truly the impetus, then give the front office props for letting Blace stick w/his vets.

JT & AC; they can't both wear 99, but that's the only down side. If they can get 15-20 sacks between them, which they're capable of, our D will be much improved.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 07:18 PM   #5
EXoffender
The Starter
 
EXoffender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 1,046
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
A 2nd sounds like a lot to me based on what's been reported previously about other teams' interest. Never know though, Vinny might have had some good intel that somebody else was offering a 3rd & something else, so he had to up the offer.

Terrible that Daniels went down, but in one day this really improves our D. I give props to Danny & Vinny for acting w/lightening speed on this after losing 2 DEs in 1 day.

Also, we never know if this deal was in the works before Daniels was hurt, but if Daniels' injury was truly the impetus, then give the front office props for letting Blace stick w/his vets.

JT & AC; they can't both wear 99, but that's the only down side. If they can get 15-20 sacks between them, which they're capable of, our D will be much improved.
Good point about not knowing if we made a offer prior to this and had to up the ante. There's still plenty of good numbers up for grabs.
EXoffender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 12:21 AM   #6
Gtothearry
The Starter
 
Gtothearry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

I'll make this short and sweet.........I APPROVE!
Gtothearry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 09:22 PM   #7
sandtrapjack
The Starter
 
sandtrapjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
The 6th is almost valueless, just a throw in deal, but Miami really made out on us with the 2nd. I mean, if Daniels doesn't go down, they either have to settle for a 4th from someone else, or just hold on to him for this season.

This is almost as nice for them as getting a 2nd for Chris Chambers. Not quite that good, but close.
Seem to remember a certain Quarterback taken in the 6th round (#199 overall) that seems better than average.......guy named Tom Brady.

Don't discount the value of later round picks, although semi-rare some tend to pan out nicely. That is why so many teams trade out of the early rounds to acquire more picks in the second day rounds. Diamond in the rough and not paying rounds 1 to 3 contract is worth that risk.
sandtrapjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 09:33 PM   #8
BigSKINBauer
Pro Bowl
 
BigSKINBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 38
Posts: 5,688
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

You have got to love the quickness by the front office to fill in the gap. Great job
BigSKINBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 09:36 PM   #9
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack View Post
Seem to remember a certain Quarterback taken in the 6th round (#199 overall) that seems better than average.......guy named Tom Brady.

Don't discount the value of later round picks, although semi-rare some tend to pan out nicely. That is why so many teams trade out of the early rounds to acquire more picks in the second day rounds. Diamond in the rough and not paying rounds 1 to 3 contract is worth that risk.
Spergon Wynn was also a sixth rounder. Scouts were just as high on him as they were on that other guy.

My point is this: people (and some football execs) overvalue 5th-7th round picks, but they seem to undervalue undrafted free agency as a means for roster filling. Because the bottom of the draft is screwed up, it makes sense to trade those picks for veteran talent, and be very agressive in signing undrafted free agents.

Many UDFAs don't get a fair shot because the team "invested" in a late rounder. If, instead, they kept the spots on their roster open, and signed a bunch of quality talent while only keeping the best, they'd be more efficient in team building.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

Last edited by GTripp0012; 07-20-2008 at 09:47 PM.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.28168 seconds with 12 queries