![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Do you approve of the trade for Jason Taylor? | |||
| Yes |
|
195 | 91.98% |
| No |
|
17 | 8.02% |
| Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
The 6th is almost valueless, just a throw in deal, but Miami really made out on us with the 2nd. I mean, if Daniels doesn't go down, they either have to settle for a 4th from someone else, or just hold on to him for this season.
This is almost as nice for them as getting a 2nd for Chris Chambers. Not quite that good, but close.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Age: 37
Posts: 3,743
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Just like some people, I think 2nd rd is kinda too much.. Also JT would be playing as left end, hope it will be a smooth change.. But there's nothing we can do but to hope the best out of this deal.. (I hope he will play more than a yr)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 1,046
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
A 2nd sounds like a lot to me based on what's been reported previously about other teams' interest. Never know though, Vinny might have had some good intel that somebody else was offering a 3rd & something else, so he had to up the offer.
Terrible that Daniels went down, but in one day this really improves our D. I give props to Danny & Vinny for acting w/lightening speed on this after losing 2 DEs in 1 day. Also, we never know if this deal was in the works before Daniels was hurt, but if Daniels' injury was truly the impetus, then give the front office props for letting Blace stick w/his vets. JT & AC; they can't both wear 99, but that's the only down side. If they can get 15-20 sacks between them, which they're capable of, our D will be much improved. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 1,046
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
I'll make this short and sweet.........I APPROVE!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
Don't discount the value of later round picks, although semi-rare some tend to pan out nicely. That is why so many teams trade out of the early rounds to acquire more picks in the second day rounds. Diamond in the rough and not paying rounds 1 to 3 contract is worth that risk. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 38
Posts: 5,688
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
You have got to love the quickness by the front office to fill in the gap. Great job
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
My point is this: people (and some football execs) overvalue 5th-7th round picks, but they seem to undervalue undrafted free agency as a means for roster filling. Because the bottom of the draft is screwed up, it makes sense to trade those picks for veteran talent, and be very agressive in signing undrafted free agents. Many UDFAs don't get a fair shot because the team "invested" in a late rounder. If, instead, they kept the spots on their roster open, and signed a bunch of quality talent while only keeping the best, they'd be more efficient in team building.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. Last edited by GTripp0012; 07-20-2008 at 09:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|