![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Do you approve of the trade for Jason Taylor? | |||
| Yes |
|
195 | 91.98% |
| No |
|
17 | 8.02% |
| Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
Don't discount the value of later round picks, although semi-rare some tend to pan out nicely. That is why so many teams trade out of the early rounds to acquire more picks in the second day rounds. Diamond in the rough and not paying rounds 1 to 3 contract is worth that risk. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 38
Posts: 5,688
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
You have got to love the quickness by the front office to fill in the gap. Great job
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
My point is this: people (and some football execs) overvalue 5th-7th round picks, but they seem to undervalue undrafted free agency as a means for roster filling. Because the bottom of the draft is screwed up, it makes sense to trade those picks for veteran talent, and be very agressive in signing undrafted free agents. Many UDFAs don't get a fair shot because the team "invested" in a late rounder. If, instead, they kept the spots on their roster open, and signed a bunch of quality talent while only keeping the best, they'd be more efficient in team building.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. Last edited by GTripp0012; 07-20-2008 at 09:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|