Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-11-2009, 01:15 PM   #1
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MdBluefinCrab View Post
Vinny needs to upgrade the O-line with a strong running game, to camouflage JC's deficiencies. That's what got us to 6-2 this past season. It wasn't anything that JC did that got us that 6-2 record, it was our O-line doing an excellent job of opening up holes for CP, in spite of JC's weak performance on the field. JC had a couple of excellent plays throughout the year, that's all. It was because of his lack of getting the ball down field and inability to score that made over 50% of those games...nail biters.
It was our Defense that won those games. It was the Defense that was mostly responsible for getting us that 6-2 record.
I hope JC at least learns to throw the ball down field more often and stops locking onto his primary receiver this off season. I don't care how many systems you have played in, that's something that should be second nature to him...jeez!
Oh well, it should be an interesting season next year but I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for JC to be an NFL QB and Vinny to actually get it right...for once.
See these are the typical negative rants that upset me. Here's my counterpoint to your rant

- JC had a stellar first half of the season, did not turn the ball over and during those first 8 games put up some very good numbers, he was among that top 10 rated QBs in the league.

- Actually I do agree with your statement about the team's inability to score, our red zone offense was horrible, and the offense did not put teams away. But I don't thin you can pin that on JC alone.

- JC did at times lock into a primary receiver, however there were times that our receivers could not get separation. JC didn't trust the rookies (not entirely his fault), and to be honest, I would have liked to have seen better production from Cooley.

Campbell needs to improve in his downfield attack, and hopefully having the rookies at full speed in camp will help develop some trust and confidence in them, allowing him to have more options. The Redskins are a run-first/pass-second team, however JC does need to develop into the type of QB that can win the game for us. Due to our good running game and our above average defense, I think we've asked the QBs to be game managers and not to go and win the game.

Honestly, I have yet to see you make anything that resembles a non-negative comment about the team. Not that you are required to make one or something, I just wonder if you have so little faith on the team and its players, why are you a fan?
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 05:52 AM   #2
44Deezel
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
See these are the typical negative rants that upset me. Here's my counterpoint to your rant

- JC had a stellar first half of the season, did not turn the ball over and during those first 8 games put up some very good numbers, he was among that top 10 rated QBs in the league.

- Actually I do agree with your statement about the team's inability to score, our red zone offense was horrible, and the offense did not put teams away. But I don't thin you can pin that on JC alone.

- JC did at times lock into a primary receiver, however there were times that our receivers could not get separation. JC didn't trust the rookies (not entirely his fault), and to be honest, I would have liked to have seen better production from Cooley.

Campbell needs to improve in his downfield attack, and hopefully having the rookies at full speed in camp will help develop some trust and confidence in them, allowing him to have more options. The Redskins are a run-first/pass-second team, however JC does need to develop into the type of QB that can win the game for us. Due to our good running game and our above average defense, I think we've asked the QBs to be game managers and not to go and win the game.

Honestly, I have yet to see you make anything that resembles a non-negative comment about the team. Not that you are required to make one or something, I just wonder if you have so little faith on the team and its players, why are you a fan?
During the greatest stretch of his pro career, he had 8 TDs in 8 games. Stellar? Yawn. Despite his limitations, I'd actually like to see the Skins re-sign Campbell and use their first pick to draft a QB. They can re-build the O line with their other draft picks and via free agency. Maybe Campbell will step up like Drew Brees did when the Chargers drafted Philip Rivers.

We'd have a much improved JC and a rookie QB drafted in the top 10. Win-win!
__________________
I am a system poster.
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 11:24 AM   #3
DBUCHANON101
The Starter
 
DBUCHANON101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44Deezel View Post
During the greatest stretch of his pro career, he had 8 TDs in 8 games. Stellar? Yawn. Despite his limitations, I'd actually like to see the Skins re-sign Campbell and use their first pick to draft a QB. They can re-build the O line with their other draft picks and via free agency. Maybe Campbell will step up like Drew Brees did when the Chargers drafted Philip Rivers.

We'd have a much improved JC and a rookie QB drafted in the top 10. Win-win!
Yeah a 1 td per game avg is awesome but it kindof takes away some of the luster when a rook QB on a team as bad as Tampa can come in and throw 3 td's in his 1st yr in the system, 1st start.
Brees was good in SD, its not like he was a scrub and then the light came on when he got to N.O
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on.
DBUCHANON101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 11:53 AM   #4
SolidSnake84
Playmaker
 
SolidSnake84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Stephens City, VA
Posts: 2,953
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

What gets me is that the kind of play we are getting out of Campbell thus far has been IDENTICAL to Mark Brunell during his final year as the starter.

He was blamed for not throwing the deep ball and always throwing the checkdown. Allegedly the line was horrible then too. It seems like for as long as i can remember, the redskins have had a horrible O-line.

Nobody is screaming bench Campbell, but they were screaming to bench Brunell when he did the same exact stuff. He actually had 8 TD's through 6 games in 2006, and when Jason had 1 TD per game, he was playing at a career level....go figure.
__________________
Time to nut up or shut up
SolidSnake84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 12:17 PM   #5
maroonandblack30
Special Teams
 
maroonandblack30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 348
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44Deezel View Post
During the greatest stretch of his pro career, he had 8 TDs in 8 games. Stellar? Yawn. Despite his limitations, I'd actually like to see the Skins re-sign Campbell and use their first pick to draft a QB. They can re-build the O line with their other draft picks and via free agency. Maybe Campbell will step up like Drew Brees did when the Chargers drafted Philip Rivers.

We'd have a much improved JC and a rookie QB drafted in the top 10. Win-win!
I was thinking the same thing....JC is a servicable NFL quarterback, I still think he has potential even though my patience is wearing thin...he will never be great but definitely be good.

Its easy to say "replace JC" but who are we replacing him with?
maroonandblack30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 01:37 PM   #6
GridIron26
Playmaker
 
GridIron26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Age: 37
Posts: 3,743
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44Deezel View Post
During the greatest stretch of his pro career, he had 8 TDs in 8 games. Stellar? Yawn. Despite his limitations, I'd actually like to see the Skins re-sign Campbell and use their first pick to draft a QB. They can re-build the O line with their other draft picks and via free agency. Maybe Campbell will step up like Drew Brees did when the Chargers drafted Philip Rivers.

We'd have a much improved JC and a rookie QB drafted in the top 10. Win-win!
I agree with this, however I would prefer for us to draft a LT in 1st round and then draft a QB in 2nd round (although my ideal is to draft offense linemen in first three drafts, 1st, 2nd, and 4th) but it is a fact that we need a QB.. I have always believed in Campbell, but just like some, my patience is wearing out thin now.. To be in win-win situation, we need to resign Campbell to maybe 1 or 2 years, and find a QB to compete for #1 spot..
GridIron26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 08:25 PM   #7
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GridIron26 View Post
I agree with this, however I would prefer for us to draft a LT in 1st round and then draft a QB in 2nd round (although my ideal is to draft offense linemen in first three drafts, 1st, 2nd, and 4th) but it is a fact that we need a QB.. I have always believed in Campbell, but just like some, my patience is wearing out thin now.. To be in win-win situation, we need to resign Campbell to maybe 1 or 2 years, and find a QB to compete for #1 spot..
2nd Round QB's have a horrible track record this past decade. If you want a QB in this league you either pick someone in the first or you hope like hell a late round guy pans out. The only 2nd round QB's that are succeeding in the league right now are Brett Farve (selected in 1992) and Drew Brees (Selected 32nd overall which today would be a 1st round pick).

Most of the time you see guys like Drew Stanton, Marques Tuiasosopo, Kevin Kolb, Kellen Clemons, Tarvaris Jackson, and Brian Brohm. Chad Henne might pan out but 2nd round QB's are even harder to turn into starters. Quincy Carter was also decent but Dallas couldn't wait to get rid of him after he failed a drug test and he never caught on again.

Anyway people can say what they want about first round QB's by they pan out a lot more frequently then their second round counterparts.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2009, 10:45 AM   #8
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

I must have missed something. Why do we have two of the same blog on the boards?
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 08:11 AM   #9
joethiesmanfan
The Starter
 
joethiesmanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

Debacle! This is horrific, I am praying for miracles. Polly wanna cracker!!
joethiesmanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 08:11 AM   #10
joethiesmanfan
The Starter
 
joethiesmanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

I like that parrot it is unique.
joethiesmanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 09:06 AM   #11
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

What the bump?
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 09:28 AM   #12
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
Interesting take on Campbell. I like the kid, but my patience with him is running out. I would have already benched him if I was the coach. I am sorry for saying that, but it is how I feel. I look at Campbell and McNabb and see two cities that veiw their QB's in an opposite manner. McNabb is on of the best winning QB's in the league and they hate him in Philadelphia. We have a QB that has been terrible and we give him every excuse for loosing. He has Portis, Moss and Cooley. How much more could he ask for. Its the Oline, its the recievers, no it is the quarterback.
Redskins, Jason Campbell Could Part Ways After '09 Season - NFL FanHouse
Honestly at this point I don't know who's most at fault. I think a little of everyone goes a long way. I was watching the Pitt/Denver game last night and at one point the announcers were commenting on how long Big Ben has to throw the ball.....he had like 5.4 seconds. They talked about it like he had all day. How long is JC being given to get rid of the ball? 1 or 2 seconds? To me it seems like JC is being given time, he may not have the lanes to throw through or receivers may not be open but I seem to think he's being given the time. At some point JC needs to just let the ball fly and expect the WR to go after the ball. If he's doing his job then the coach's can yell at the WR/TE for not doing their part. I understand ball security but JC is simply over thinking some plays and when he decides that a certain receiver is open enough for him to get them the ball it's almost too late and he throws the ball at a spot where the receiver either has to slow down causing the defender to catch up or behind the receiver.

In the Atlanta game people want to bash Davis for not making the catch and it turning into an interception....how about JC not throwing the ball so hard on a 5 yrd pass, not throwing it too high, and not throwing it at a point behind the TE. I understand it it Davis's hands and he should have caught it, but I still think JC is partially to blame for not throwing the ball better, then there's the fact that we needed 22yrds and he's throwing to Davis 5yrds out with 3 defenders draped around him.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 10:11 AM   #13
joethiesmanfan
The Starter
 
joethiesmanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

Rapper Wale has got our "Attention" - ESPN
joethiesmanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 10:57 AM   #14
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

amen SBXVII!
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 02:22 PM   #15
theJBexperience
Impact Rookie
 
theJBexperience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
Re: Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

Why would JC want to come back?
theJBexperience is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.02508 seconds with 11 queries