Which USC linebacker would you like the most and why?

[SkinsFanSince91]

Originally Posted by 53Fan

I'm becoming a bigger fan of Matthews all the time.

Clay Matthews will prove to be the better of the bunch. Period,

His athleticism gives him the better upside. He can cover better than Cushing and Rey. Mike Mayock said that he looked like a safety out there in his drop drills. The SAM LB will be covering the TE most of the time, and we want/need an athlete there. Our SLB needs to be able to cover Witten and other TE's.

HE can rush the passer as a DE if need be as well, so be brings versatility as well.

Matthews = This year's JOrdy Nelson

[Nflnick11]

Originally Posted by SkinsFanSince91

Clay Matthews will prove to be the better of the bunch. Period,

His athleticism gives him the better upside. He can cover better than Cushing and Rey. Mike Mayock said that he looked like a safety out there in his drop drills. The SAM LB will be covering the TE most of the time, and we want/need an athlete there. Our SLB needs to be able to cover Witten and other TE's.

HE can rush the passer as a DE if need be as well, so be brings versatility as well.

Matthews = This year's JOrdy Nelson

The WLB covers the TE usually, the WLB is the safety like LB and the SLB is like a DE

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by Nflnick11

The WLB covers the TE usually, the WLB is the safety like LB and the SLB is like a DE

Well, the WLB is only a WLB when he lines up on the weakside, which is determined by where the Tight End isn't. Normally he ends up responsible for a slot receiver or a running back in zone coverage, or the fullback or running back in man coverage.

[Nflnick11]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Well, the WLB is only a WLB when he lines up on the weakside, which is determined by where the Tight End isn't. Normally he ends up responsible for a slot receiver or a running back in zone coverage, or the fullback or running back in man coverage.

Hmm I thought otherwise but I'll take your word for it I just remember hearing that oversized safeties move to WLB and that lance Briggs plays WLB and covers every position every down...and are you telling me that marcus Washington covers more than rocky??

[53Fan]

[quote=Nflnick11;543313]Hmm I thought otherwise but I'll take your word for it I just remember hearing that oversized safeties move to WLB and that lance Briggs plays WLB and covers every position every down...and are you telling me that marcus Washington covers more than rocky??[/quote]

He's right Nick. Strongside is wherever the TE lines up and it's usually on the right side. Rocky usually covers a RB, FB, or slot receiver.

[SkinsFanSince91]

Originally Posted by Nflnick11

Hmm I thought otherwise but I'll take your word for it I just remember hearing that oversized safeties move to WLB and that lance Briggs plays WLB and covers every position every down...and are you telling me that marcus Washington covers more than rocky??

You are right and they are wrong.

The weak side linebacke(WLB or Will) lines up on the OPPOSITE side of the TE, and the strong-side linebacker (SLB or Sam linebacker) lines up on the same side of the tight end. This is how it has always been, and it has nto changed.

The strong side lbs usually have to be bigger because they are taking on more blocks in the run game. The weak-side lb can be smaller because they are needed to use their quickness and agility to operate in space.

When a weakside LB switches to the strong side they tend to have lesser productive seasons (ex. Cato June in Tampa).

[53Fan]

Originally Posted by SkinsFanSince91

You are right and they are wrong.

The weak side linebacke(WLB or Will) lines up on the OPPOSITE side of the TE, and the strong-side linebacker (SLB or Sam linebacker) lines up on the same side of the tight end. This is how it has always been, and it has nto changed.

The strong side lbs usually have to be bigger because they are taking on more blocks in the run game. The weak-side lb can be smaller because they are needed to use their quickness and agility to operate in space.

When a weakside LB switches to the strong side they tend to have lesser productive seasons (ex. Cato June in Tampa).

Right. The SLB lines up on the same side as the TE. Do you remember Witten beating Marcus for a TD last year? (Even though it was Hortons fault for not coming over the top like he was suppose to) That's why the SLB usually covers the TE. They line up on the same side. So what are we wrong about?

[Nflnick11]

Originally Posted by 53Fan

Right. The SLB lines up on the same side as the TE. Do you remember Witten beating Marcus for a TD last year? (Even though it was Hortons fault for not coming over the top like he was suppose to) That's why the SLB usually covers the TE. They line up on the same side. So what are we wrong about?

I'm so confused...isn't rocky a WLB or is he a SLB I just remember marcus getting beat by witten and I was like "he doesn't look like he should be in coverage" and I could of sworn that he was a SLB..and explain to me why safeties that are to big to play in the NFL get moved to WLB when you all say WLBs can't cover but safeties are your main part to coverage???