O-line The Real Problem

illdefined · 12-20-2004, 10:00 AM

http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=5119

i don't think getting a bigger back is the answer (although Rock Cartwright shouldn't have lost that weight, condemned him to special teams).

the answer is whipping the OLine into shape and calling plays that use Portis's SPEED. a toss or sweep from that close with Portis has to be close to 100%. Gibbs keeps going back to this one-dimensional offense even after he's seen what opening up accomplishes

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

12-20-2004, 10:00 AM	#22
illdefined Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: nyc Age: 50 Posts: 2,631	http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=5119 i don't think getting a bigger back is the answer (although Rock Cartwright shouldn't have lost that weight, condemned him to special teams). the answer is whipping the OLine into shape and calling plays that use Portis's SPEED. a toss or sweep from that close with Portis has to be close to 100%. Gibbs keeps going back to this one-dimensional offense even after he's seen what opening up accomplishes

O-line The Real Problem

Locker Room Main Forum