![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,198
|
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!
Average is probably the better word. Sure he's not a liability, but he's not asset either. I don't think the same can be for Cooley who knows he needs to block for Portis to open up the passing game for himself and others. I think Dainels is a good TE who can stretch the field and is probably the best run after the catch TE right now, but if you ask him to block I don't think he's as open to it as Cooley.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,198
|
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!
He's going to block but he probably doesn't care about it as much as pass catching. In terms of all around talent at the TE position, I just think Cooley has an edge.
Last edited by vallin21; 07-08-2009 at 05:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!
I see. Well, I'm having a hard time seeing how you've come to that conclusion. I'm guessing you're just assuming he doesn't really care so much about blocking?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|