Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Off-Topic Discussion > Other Sports

Other Sports Discuss the Caps, Nats, Wizards, and everything else not related to the NFL here!


Tiger Asks for Mulligan; Promises to Keep Driver in Bag

Other Sports


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-29-2009, 01:53 PM   #1
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Tiger Asks for Mulligan; Promises to Keep Driver in Bag

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
Nice read.
I thought it was really brave of him to admit his own infidelities.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 12:30 PM   #2
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,235
Re: Tiger Asks for Mulligan; Promises to Keep Driver in Bag

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
I thought it was really brave of him to admit his own infidelities.

I was going to comment on you saying that then deleted that portion of my orginal post.

I think you may be missing the point a bit. IMO he is saying there is no heriosm in infideity. Too often the infideitly in a celebratory is overlooked. Like saying wow how brave for him to come out, when we should be like shame on him.

It is hard to put into words.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 12:47 PM   #3
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Tiger Asks for Mulligan; Promises to Keep Driver in Bag

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
I was going to comment on you saying that then deleted that portion of my orginal post.

I think you may be missing the point a bit. IMO he is saying there is no heriosm in infideity. Too often the infideitly in a celebratory is overlooked. Like saying wow how brave for him to come out, when we should be like shame on him.

It is hard to put into words.
It was brave for him to take that approach IMO. It definitely lended a ton of credibility to his perspective if nothing else. Sure, shame on him for cheating on his ex-wife, but he obviously has owned his issues and taken measures to correct them. I think it took a great deal of humility to relate to Tiger in this fashion for all to read. He didn't have to say anything at all. I don't believe I am missing the point.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 10:51 AM   #4
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
Re: Tiger Asks for Mulligan; Promises to Keep Driver in Bag

Un-f'ing-believable:

__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 11:35 AM   #5
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
Re: Tiger Asks for Mulligan; Promises to Keep Driver in Bag

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
Un-f'ing-believable:

I don't get why anyone cares about this??? I mean I do understand people not agreeing and not wanting to hear it but why the uproar? I didn't hear anything realy controversial. It's not like the people who are mad about this are watching Fox anyways. It seems like much ado...
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 01:46 PM   #6
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
Re: Tiger Asks for Mulligan; Promises to Keep Driver in Bag

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
I don't get why anyone cares about this??? I mean I do understand people not agreeing and not wanting to hear it but why the uproar? I didn't hear anything realy controversial. It's not like the people who are mad about this are watching Fox anyways. It seems like much ado...
His speech is infuriating because a) he assumes Jesus is the only path to forgiveness and redemption as a matter of fact, b) belittles Buddhism as somehow inferior religion without knowing anything about its teachings on the matter of forgiveness and redemptions, and c) Hume claims he isn't proselytizing.

From philosophical prospective Buddhism speaks elegantly on the subject of forgiveness and redemption.


You know, if Gov. Mark Sanford was Buddhist he would find forgiveness and redemption with less strings attached.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 02:19 PM   #7
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
Re: Tiger Asks for Mulligan; Promises to Keep Driver in Bag

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
His speech is infuriating because a) he assumes Jesus is the only path to forgiveness and redemption as a matter of fact, b) belittles Buddhism as somehow inferior religion without knowing anything about its teachings on the matter of forgiveness and redemptions, and c) Hume claims he isn't proselytizing.

From philosophical prospective Buddhism speaks elegantly on the subject of forgiveness and redemption.


You know, if Gov. Mark Sanford was Buddhist he would find forgiveness and redemption with less strings attached.
Well I didn't really see it the same way.

a) Yeah that's what religions do. They don't allow for other religions. Anyone who is a Christian tacitly believes the same way as Brit. Anyone who is Buddhist believes similarly in the singularity of their ideas. If we all got worked up over what religions think of other religions the world would be in trouble. Oh wait everyone already does.

b) I think he was somewhat dismissive of Buddhism but "belittles"? Really? He made one minor observation (apparently out of ignorance and turn) but it wasn't belittling. That's over-analyzing it.

c) Yeah that is a crock I agree.

But in the end aren't you and a bunch of others getting worked up over something that is really not important and not nearly anything close to a big deal? In fact the furor over this is the only thing making it a deal at all. Otherwise it was just another blowhard (which Brit doesn't usually seem to be) saying stuff.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.50114 seconds with 11 queries