|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-07-2004, 11:43 PM | #16 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
I tend to agree with folks here that I would not be setting any world land speed records to make either trade. But I have a strong reason to believe that both trades have been offered.
I agree that losing Smoot is the wrong thing to do now since there isn't anyone on the roster who looks like a guy just waiting to start at CB in order to shine. I don't like that trade at all. Imagine trading Smoot away and Springs getting injured so that he misses 6 games. Given what is on the roster now, the word that springs to mind is "OUCH !!!" The second one is appealing to some small degree because what the Skins give up is Trotter (pretty much gone anyway) and a mid-round pick next year (not good to lose but not a horrendous price either) in order to move up from #5 to #1. Everyone here is correct, the Skins don't need the #1 pick this year to utilize the draft for their needs, but think about what you might possibly get for the #1 pick. Before I turned that deal down, I'd go around the league to see what I might get for the overall #1 pick. If that deal was sweet, I'd consider the Trade #2 only as a prelude to a future deal. Whatever...
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
Advertisements |
04-08-2004, 12:20 AM | #17 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Matoaca, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
If we got more picks than reported then yeah, alls im saying is I think that smoot is more valuable to our deffense than i believe any other team would be willing to give us. |
|
04-08-2004, 12:41 AM | #18 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
I didn't mean Smoot, I meant trading the #1 overall pick out for more picks.
|
04-08-2004, 01:21 AM | #19 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Matoaca, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 19
|
i understand what you mean but i just dont like the thought of moving up to just trade back down. i think its safer to see what you could get for the 5th pick and see what you can get for trotter. then just hold on to next years picks. just seems risky just to move up to see what happens.
|
04-08-2004, 01:44 AM | #20 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 42
Posts: 5,454
|
I think all of the options everyone has posted seem very interesting but mabye for once we should keep our picks, keep gardner and draft Taylor and acutally build through the draft with our three picks this year and i guess six next year.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis |
04-08-2004, 02:29 AM | #21 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Quote:
First off, I wouldn't trade Smoot! No way! No how! Although I have been tempted to change my user name to Khary Campbell Fan Club And I completely agree that if you're going to try for the #1 overall pick I'd first see what I could get for that pick. I wouldn't want to keep the pick but use it, as curmudgeon says, for future moves
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
04-08-2004, 08:56 AM | #22 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bolton, Lancashire
Age: 53
Posts: 166
|
Smoot is now the best corner we have and we would be idiots to trade him.
|
04-08-2004, 09:52 AM | #23 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 55
Posts: 907
|
Quote:
|
|
04-08-2004, 12:37 PM | #24 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
smootsmack:
1. No pun intended! 2. Khary Campbell Fan Club is much too long a screen name for me to type. If you adopt it, I'll have to refer to you KCFC...
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
04-08-2004, 12:41 PM | #25 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Quote:
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
04-08-2004, 01:06 PM | #26 |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
|
Well I guess that settles it for me. Under no circumstances can we trade Smoot. Making Smootsmack moot is impermissable.
|
04-08-2004, 08:28 PM | #27 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 42
Posts: 5,454
|
This would be the first year thta they dotn use smoot as trade bait... around this time of year his name and gardners is always mentioned for trades
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis |
04-08-2004, 10:20 PM | #28 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 63
|
Or else be called The Artist Formerly Known as Smootsmack.
|
04-08-2004, 10:26 PM | #29 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|