![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2? | |||
| Yes |
|
193 | 91.47% |
| No |
|
18 | 8.53% |
| Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
wow Three 1's and a 2
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,543
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
That is a lot. I'm happy to have RG3 but I don't know about giving up that much. At least it isn't all one draft.
__________________
Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever... Team Heinicke Fan Club punch it in - CEO SkinzWin - President FrenchSkin - VP of Global Operations ODUsmitty - Director of Cheerleader Fulfillment Meks - Director of Marketing |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,687
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
In my thinking... there are 3 unique factors that FORCED the Skins into 3-1st Round Picks:
A) The Browns - We just HAPPENED (our luck) to be competing with a team who had 2 1st round picks when we are trying to trade up. Bad coincidence... this drove the asking price up. B) Peyton Manning - Apparently, Peyton Manning was not going to be a backup/fallback option and our whole FO & Staff knew we NEEDED one of the "big 3 (Luck, RGII, Manning)"... this drove our buying point up. C) WR Position - We just happen to be shopping for a top-teir FA WR at the same time as this scenario is playing out. This means we had to make a deal early, before free agency starts. Hard to sell a WR on a team with no QB... The flip-side is, the cost goes up BECAUSE free agency hasn't started, with FA QB options landing with teams competing for the #2 pick. Ouch. 3 bad coincidences that just happened to hit us as this trade played out. I say... hey... they realized they had to do what they had to do to get their guy. I hate losing the 2nd round pick the most, though... but... hey... WE HAVE A REAL HOPE AT THE QB POSITION FOR THE FIRST TIME IN A LOOOOOONNNNGGG TIME!!! LET'S CELEBRATE THAT, NOT WHAT THE FUTURE PICKS "MAY" HAVE BEEN!!
__________________
“Sometimes it is not enough to our best; we must do what is required.” - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965) |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,687
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
"Originally Posted by GusFrerotte
Stupid. You just traded away 3 badly needed starters for one. What happened through getting more picks like NE and building steadily. This kid isn't a Manning or Elway or Luck type out of college. He is a very good QB no less, but played in a weakend Big 12 that happens to be defensively deficient most of the time. Snyder has done it again, got the fans snagged on the hot sexy pick, hoping it will pan out. I think BA and Shanny are feeling the heat so they went against the plan to save their asses. I like RG III a lot, but 3 first rounders for a still unproven commodity at the NFL level is not wise." I'm not a "RGII walks on water person", but I'll say this... vs Texas = #11 defense in the country in 2012 (they were VERY good): RGIII - 15-22, 320 yds, 2 TD, INT vs TCU = #34 in the country: 21-27, 359 yds, 5 TD, 0 INT Those aren't OK numbers... they are great... and he's playing with a Baylor offensive line (not Wisconsin's), and throwing to Baylor WRs (not Miami's or USCs). I just mean, he may flop, but I hate when people use the whole Big 12 argument... that's just me.
__________________
“Sometimes it is not enough to our best; we must do what is required.” - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965) |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 74
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Pretty much sums up how I feel about this trade, now that it is a week old. Now I'll vote how I'm not in favor. That's a lot of our future right there, and I would have preferred to trade back, not up!
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship! |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,880
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Quote:
It was iffy at best for me looking at the redskins without one of those 2. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|