Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2?
Yes 193 91.47%
No 18 8.53%
Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2012, 11:29 PM   #1
Gtothearry
The Starter
 
Gtothearry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
Nope. We don't have the team in place to make a run yet. I thought we were on the right path for a change to build a solid winner. Any good SB winning HOF QB in the last 20 years always had a star studded cast to help him win. Do you think we are a star studded team? We gave up the ghost for a guy with reat talent, but who doesn't have the best Wr corp or O line protecting him. If our WR corp was more reliable and the O line solid the deal would have been OK, but with the reality of the situation, this is a big ass gamble.
Yes, we have holes but a great QB makes a team better. Place some of the Patriots offensive playmakers on the Skins with Grossman at QB and see how great they do.
Gtothearry is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:40 PM   #2
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtothearry View Post
Yes, we have holes but a great QB makes a team better. Place some of the Patriots offensive playmakers on the Skins with Grossman at QB and see how great they do.
That's just the thing though. We're not getting a great QB. We're getting a great QB prospect. And a prospect needs his teammates to pick up some of the slack early in his career so he can pay it back on the back end.

To be clear, by the time we're talking about Griffin carrying us, you're talking 2016, 2017, 2018. Only one QB drafted by the Redskins since the merger made it that far into his career before being forced out of town.

In the mean time, what you KNOW you have in Griffin is a viable starter at the quarterback position. Which we've had in plenty of other years from Grossman to McNabb, Campbell, Brunell, Johnson, etc.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:42 PM   #3
skinsnut
Playmaker
 
skinsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,060
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
That's just the thing though. We're not getting a great QB. We're getting a great QB prospect. And a prospect needs his teammates to pick up some of the slack early in his career so he can pay it back on the back end.

To be clear, by the time we're talking about Griffin carrying us, you're talking 2016, 2017, 2018. Only one QB drafted by the Redskins since the merger made it that far into his career before being forced out of town.

In the mean time, what you KNOW you have in Griffin is a viable starter at the quarterback position. Which we've had in plenty of other years from Grossman to McNabb, Campbell, Brunell, Johnson, etc.
I agree.
for 3 first rounders and a 2nd...do you think we could have gotten Drew Breese?..or any pro bowl QB out there?....I say ....possibly.
This guy is an unknown commodity...and yes...the skins paid way too much...I am bummed, but at least I am hopeful
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period
skinsnut is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:48 PM   #4
Hail to the Redskins
The Starter
 
Hail to the Redskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,687
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

How about we all just look at it this way... AND IN THIS ORDER....





__________________
“Sometimes it is not enough to our best; we must do what is required.”
- Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
Hail to the Redskins is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:51 PM   #5
CultBrennan59
Pro Bowl
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hail to the Redskins View Post
How about we all just look at it this way... AND IN THIS ORDER....





I LOVE that last pic.

The first ones funny cause you can tell its a very big bodied guy with rg3s face on it haha
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams"
CultBrennan59 is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:54 PM   #6
Hail to the Redskins
The Starter
 
Hail to the Redskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,687
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

I know it's been posted before... but it is now time for it officially...

__________________
“Sometimes it is not enough to our best; we must do what is required.”
- Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
Hail to the Redskins is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:58 PM   #7
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by hail to the redskins View Post
how about we all just look at it this way... And in this order....





looooooove it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:52 PM   #8
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsnut View Post
I agree.
for 3 first rounders and a 2nd...do you think we could have gotten Drew Breese?..or any pro bowl QB out there?....I say ....possibly.
This guy is an unknown commodity...and yes...the skins paid way too much...I am bummed, but at least I am hopeful
Yeah, though Drew Brees' franchise tag is exclusive specifically so we couldn't have signed him for less than it cost to get RG3.

The list of QBs you couldn't have got for this price is Andrew Luck, Tom Brady, Cam Newton, Philip Rivers and maybe Eli?

You probably could have gotten Matthew Stafford for this price. I think at least.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:55 PM   #9
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Yeah, though Drew Brees' franchise tag is exclusive specifically so we couldn't have signed him for less than it cost to get RG3.

The list of QBs you couldn't have got for this price is Andrew Luck, Tom Brady, Cam Newton, Philip Rivers and maybe Eli?

You probably could have gotten Matthew Stafford for this price. I think at least.
BTW Tripp, I saw on Twitter something similar to what you said some weeks ago...about Shanahan not caring about the first rounder in two or three years years.

I think it makes sense in a way. Shanahan is going to roll with RG3, get two years with him to make it work. And well if he doesn't work out, MS would be gone.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:46 PM   #10
Gtothearry
The Starter
 
Gtothearry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
That's just the thing though. We're not getting a great QB. We're getting a great QB prospect. And a prospect needs his teammates to pick up some of the slack early in his career so he can pay it back on the back end.

To be clear, by the time we're talking about Griffin carrying us, you're talking 2016, 2017, 2018. Only one QB drafted by the Redskins since the merger made it that far into his career before being forced out of town.

In the mean time, what you KNOW you have in Griffin is a viable starter at the quarterback position. Which we've had in plenty of other years from Grossman to McNabb, Campbell, Brunell, Johnson, etc.
True, but we may have missed out on a great QB if we didn't make the trade. Ya never know........
Gtothearry is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:54 PM   #11
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtothearry View Post
True, but we may have missed out on a great QB if we didn't make the trade. Ya never know........
Well, all great QBs are prospects first.

I was just saying that RG3 isn't going to carry the team and make everyone else better first year out of college. He might be better than expected in year one. He actually probably will be. But we're still not a great team yet. And this definitely hurts the ability for us to draft a great team.

We can try to sign a team still. Lots of talent out there. But it's been mixed results in the past.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

Last edited by GTripp0012; 03-09-2012 at 11:56 PM.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.44848 seconds with 12 queries