Interesting Packers Stat...

Monkeydad · 10-12-2007, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monksdown

A little more detail.

Oakland: Jon Kitna(289 yds;3TD/2Int) 17th currently against pass
Minnesota: Jon Kitna(245 yds;1TD/1int) 31st currently
Philly: Jon Kitna(446;2td/1int) 12th currently
Chicago: Jon Kitna (247yds;2td/1int) 29th currently
Washington: Jon Kitna(106yds:0td/2int) 15th against the pass currently.

Yep, I used NET passing yards from boxscores, but your rankings are off according to what I have seen. Where'd you get those?

reference: links in http://www.redskinswarpath.com/locke...-rankings.html

NFL - Statistics by Team - Yahoo! Sports shows passing/rushing ranks.

dmek25 · 10-12-2007, 02:26 PM

good first post, and welcome. i see more of the same defense the skins used against the lions. the packers run the west coast, with just about everything thrown underneath. getting pressure on Favre is a big key this week

Beemnseven · 10-12-2007, 02:30 PM

Another interesting note: The Redskins haven't won at Lambeau Field since Oct. 23, 1988 -- final score, Skins 20, Pack, 17.

Monkeydad · 10-12-2007, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

Another interesting note: The Redskins haven't won at Lambeau Field since Oct. 23, 1988 -- final score, Skins 20, Pack, 17.

Yeah, but we don't play them often, so that 19 years looks worse than it really is.

SouperMeister · 10-15-2007, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

Another interesting note: The Redskins haven't won at Lambeau Field since Oct. 23, 1988 -- final score, Skins 20, Pack, 17.

That was the first day of my honeymoon - I sent the little lady shopping when I realized that I could see the Skins in Grand Cayman ;-)

I recall Kelvin Bryant got the start at RB and had a career day for the Skins.

Monkeydad · 10-12-2007, 02:30 PM

OK, NFL.com's rankings match mine.

Seriously, where'd you find those?

NFL Stats: by Team Category

We're ranked 8th in passing, not 15th.

Eagles are 21st in pass D, not 12th.

And so on...

Monksdown · 10-12-2007, 02:32 PM

im such a moron, i was looking at overall offense. shoot me now.

Monkeydad · 10-12-2007, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monksdown

im such a moron, i was looking at overall offense. shoot me now.

Offense. OK.

I was just making sure I wasn't blind or dumb. :cheeky-sm

Monkeydad · 10-12-2007, 02:33 PM

From Washington Redskins

REDSKINS 2007 STATISTICAL RANKINGS

Offense Rank Yards/Game
Total Offense 12 340.8
Rushing Offense 10 130.2
Passing Offense 19 210.5
Defense Rank Yards/Game
Total Defense 3 268.0
Rushing Defense 9 86.0
Passing Defense 8 182.0

PACKERS 2007 STATISTICAL RANKINGS

Offense Rank Yards/Game
Total Offense 6 362.2
Rushing Offense 31 67.6
Passing Offense 1 294.6
Defense Rank Yards/Game
Total Defense 17 328.0
Rushing Defense 14 101.6
Passing Defense 23 226.4

warriorzpath · 10-12-2007, 02:39 PM

Interesting stat, I just don't like the idea of tearing down an opponent's success to feel good about the redskins chances. That's underestimating the opponent and having a lack of respect for them. At least a couple of the Packers' opponents on defense have played great in past seasons and still employ the same scheme and have most of their personnel.

Monkeydad · 10-12-2007, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warriorzpath

Interesting stat, I just don't like the idea of tearing down an opponent's success to feel good about the redskins chances. That's underestimating the opponent and having a lack of respect for them. At least a couple of the Packers' opponents on defense have played great in past seasons and still employ the same scheme and have most of their personnel.

No one is tearing them down.

They have a good offense, so far, despite the weak opponents. Their passing game is tops in the league and their running game is next-to-last, ranked #31. Our offense is in the top half of the league, more balanced with rushing and passing, doing fairly well in both.

We have one of the top defenses in the league, FAR better than theirs (us 3rd, them 17th and surrender 60 more yards a game than us.

Defense will decide the game and going by stats and the season so far, we have a BIG advantage, especially with their CBs not being healthy: Blackmon - out (foot), Harris - probable (Back), Woodson - probable (foot)

SouperMeister · 10-12-2007, 02:46 PM

Interesting stat indeed. The Skins D has given up a grand total of 2 TD passes all season. I like our chances even more after seeing the relative weakness of pass defenses that Favre has faced.

ingibbswetrust · 10-12-2007, 05:03 PM

The main difference between the packers and lions offenses is the packers superior offensive line and the fact that farve is very tough to bring down. It helps that their center is out but I don't see our dline being able to harrass GB all day without the help of some blitzes. Should definitely still be a close game but I just don't see Farve putting up 300 yds through the air against our secondary.

ingibbswetrust · 10-15-2007, 11:36 AM

Follow-up:

week 1: Philly: Farve 206 yds (0 TD, 1 INT), philly ranks 21st
week 2: NYG: Farve 286 yds (3 TD, 1 INT), nyg ranks 20th
week 3: SD: Farve 369 yds (3 TD, 0 INT). SD ranks 27th
week 4: Minn: Farve 344 yds (2 TD, 0 INT), Minn ranks 30th
week 5: Chicago: Farve 322 yds (1 TD, 2 INT), Chicago ranks 26th

week 6: Skins: Farve 188 yds (0 TD, 2 INT) = QB Rating of 43.5, Skins now rank 5th in nfl in pass defense at 179.4 ypg

Can't blame our secondary or defense for this one, although a few more picks would have helped.

TheMalcolmConnection · 10-15-2007, 11:38 AM

I mean our defense only gave up one touchdown anyway. It's depressing.

10-12-2007, 02:26 PM	#2
dmek25 MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 64 Posts: 10,672	Re: Interesting Packers Stat... good first post, and welcome. i see more of the same defense the skins used against the lions. the packers run the west coast, with just about everything thrown underneath. getting pressure on Favre is a big key this week __________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan

10-12-2007, 02:30 PM	#6
Monkeydad Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 46 Posts: 17,460	Re: Interesting Packers Stat... OK, NFL.com's rankings match mine. Seriously, where'd you find those? NFL Stats: by Team Category We're ranked 8th in passing, not 15th. Eagles are 21st in pass D, not 12th. And so on...

10-12-2007, 02:32 PM	#7
Monksdown The Starter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Warrenton, Virginia Age: 45 Posts: 1,515	Re: Interesting Packers Stat... im such a moron, i was looking at overall offense. shoot me now.

10-12-2007, 02:33 PM	#9
Monkeydad Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 46 Posts: 17,460	Re: Interesting Packers Stat... From Washington Redskins REDSKINS 2007 STATISTICAL RANKINGS Offense Rank Yards/Game Total Offense 12 340.8 Rushing Offense 10 130.2 Passing Offense 19 210.5 Defense Rank Yards/Game Total Defense 3 268.0 Rushing Defense 9 86.0 Passing Defense 8 182.0 PACKERS 2007 STATISTICAL RANKINGS Offense Rank Yards/Game Total Offense 6 362.2 Rushing Offense 31 67.6 Passing Offense 1 294.6 Defense Rank Yards/Game Total Defense 17 328.0 Rushing Defense 14 101.6 Passing Defense 23 226.4

10-12-2007, 02:39 PM	#10
warriorzpath Registered User Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 1,880	Re: Interesting Packers Stat... Interesting stat, I just don't like the idea of tearing down an opponent's success to feel good about the redskins chances. That's underestimating the opponent and having a lack of respect for them. At least a couple of the Packers' opponents on defense have played great in past seasons and still employ the same scheme and have most of their personnel.

10-12-2007, 02:30 PM	#3
Beemnseven Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 52 Posts: 5,311	Re: Interesting Packers Stat... Another interesting note: The Redskins haven't won at Lambeau Field since Oct. 23, 1988 -- final score, Skins 20, Pack, 17.

10-12-2007, 02:46 PM	#12
SouperMeister Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 61 Posts: 3,419	Re: Interesting Packers Stat... Interesting stat indeed. The Skins D has given up a grand total of 2 TD passes all season. I like our chances even more after seeing the relative weakness of pass defenses that Favre has faced.

10-12-2007, 05:03 PM	#13
ingibbswetrust Camp Scrub Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 40	Re: Interesting Packers Stat... The main difference between the packers and lions offenses is the packers superior offensive line and the fact that farve is very tough to bring down. It helps that their center is out but I don't see our dline being able to harrass GB all day without the help of some blitzes. Should definitely still be a close game but I just don't see Farve putting up 300 yds through the air against our secondary.

10-15-2007, 11:36 AM	#14
ingibbswetrust Camp Scrub Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 40	Re: Interesting Packers Stat... Follow-up: week 1: Philly: Farve 206 yds (0 TD, 1 INT), philly ranks 21st week 2: NYG: Farve 286 yds (3 TD, 1 INT), nyg ranks 20th week 3: SD: Farve 369 yds (3 TD, 0 INT). SD ranks 27th week 4: Minn: Farve 344 yds (2 TD, 0 INT), Minn ranks 30th week 5: Chicago: Farve 322 yds (1 TD, 2 INT), Chicago ranks 26th week 6: Skins: Farve 188 yds (0 TD, 2 INT) = QB Rating of 43.5, Skins now rank 5th in nfl in pass defense at 179.4 ypg Can't blame our secondary or defense for this one, although a few more picks would have helped.

10-15-2007, 11:38 AM	#15
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 44 Posts: 19,264	Re: Interesting Packers Stat... I mean our defense only gave up one touchdown anyway. It's depressing. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Interesting Packers Stat...

Locker Room Main Forum