![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
I get that teams will always sell the positive, but all they could have said is we believe in Weeden as our starter. No need to diss the other prospects in the process of pumping up your own guy.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Last year they didn't draft a QB I'm the entire draft (starter or back-up) though it was a need.
And the reason I kept hearing was they didn't like the QBs. In that sense its similar to the reports that Browns didn't like these QBs (Sweden nws) But, itsmoot point really. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Quote:
But as you say, it doesn't matter now.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
^^ Except, we didn't cluster offer a bunch of first rounders in an attempt to move up, lose out, blame the loss on the "old boy" network and then attempt to say we weren't really interested in the first place -- only to grab a guy who would likely have been available in the next round.
Moot or not, the Browns actions are not even remotely similar to what we did last year by simply passing on QB's. If all that the Browns had done was draft Richardson and Weeden (no attempted trade) - then it's a "whatever, dude". As it is, it's just sounds dishonest and pathetic.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
The Browns situation is definitely much different.
They really need to just shut the F up about it already. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
The Browns can't say we don't like any of these QBs in the draft and turn around and draft a 29 year old system QB who threw to an amazing college WR.
I agree with MattyK. They need a nice...
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
We needed QBs, they needed a QB
We passed on every QB in the draft, they passed on some QBs It has been implied that both organizations didn't like the QBs they didn't draft •shrugs• not the same, but similar |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
30 gut, I don't think its the same, now if we had drafted Gabbert or Ponder, and said, well we weren't really looking at Locker, then it gets closer, but ultimately, Shanahan always says we got our guy, as does every good coach. They just don't flip as early and as often (unless your name is Jim Harbaugh)
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 736
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Source (Washington Post):
Good read on RGIII's progress in the Redskins offense . . . Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,592
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
I do too. But DeMarcus Ware wasn't out there. Neither was Justin Tuck. Or Trent Cole. I didn't think he'd have any problems picking up the offense. We're talking about a highly intelligent person. Will he pick up the nuances of play QB? ... like Steve Young did and Michael Vick has done. Can he stay healthy? These are the questions that will be answered in Sept.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
I think John Keim hit the nail on the head here:
So now the Browns are letting it slip that maybe they weren’t that high on Robert Griffin III after all, according to an article on ESPN Cleveland’s site (by longtime and respected beat writer Tony Grossi). The report said the Browns felt perhaps he was a little small and too focused on showing how fast he could run. As someone who grew up in Cleveland, here’s what I have to say: Quit talking nonsense. Judge by actions, not words. And the Browns made a hell of an offer to St. Louis for the No. 2 pick and then complained when they didn’t receive a chance to counter and make a sweeter offer. That tells me one thing: They liked Griffin a lot. Perhaps they now love Brandon Weeden, and that’s fine. But don’t try to convince everyone you didn’t like the other guy. If that were the case, then there would have been zero trade talk. |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,117
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
i can't remember who was talking about griff running the option, but feel free to embelish
Robert Griffin III: I'm not just an option QB - NFL.com
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 16
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
In Washington, 'The Franchise' is fitting in - NFC East Blog - ESPN
Articles like this make me really excited to see how RGIII impacts this team. Should be fun watching him play. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Sapp said on NFL total access that he think s Griff will fail under shanny because Mike is to stubborn to change the offense.. guess we'll see
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|