RGIII Named Starter - Commanders Post at The Warpath

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop

Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

RGIII Named Starter

User Name Remember Me?

Password

Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion

Go to Page...

RGIII Named Starter

Locker Room Main Forum

Thread Tools Display Modes

Prev Next

06-07-2012, 10:56 AM #11

30gut

Playmaker

Join Date: Feb 2008

Posts: 3,323

Re: RGIII Named Starter

Last year they didn't draft a QB I'm the entire draft (starter or back-up) though it was a need.
And the reason I kept hearing was they didn't like the QBs.
In that sense its similar to the reports that Browns didn't like these QBs (Sweden nws)
But, itsmoot point really.

30gut

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by 30gut

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Show Printable Version

Display Modes

Switch to Linear Mode

Switch to Hybrid Mode

Threaded Mode

Posting Rules

You may not post new threads

You may not post replies

You may not post attachments

You may not edit your posts

BB code is On

Smilies are On

[IMG] code is On

HTML code is Off

Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 AM.

Contact Us - Commanders Post at The Warpath - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.53335 seconds with 11 queries

06-07-2012, 10:56 AM	#11
30gut Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 3,323	Re: RGIII Named Starter Last year they didn't draft a QB I'm the entire draft (starter or back-up) though it was a need. And the reason I kept hearing was they didn't like the QBs. In that sense its similar to the reports that Browns didn't like these QBs (Sweden nws) But, itsmoot point really.