Chemistry can't be bought

[#56fanatic]

you know, I feel a little different than most when it comes to blaming Danny. I dont think he has played one snap, or coached one play (at least not since 2000) The coaches he has had in the past and present let him know what they need or want to win. He goes out and gets them. He gives our coaches the tools to win. How someone can blame a guy who writes the checks for a teams lousy play is beyond me. If the guy didn't spend the money, he would be critisized too. He can't win with most people. I did blame him for the debacle with the fantasy team he tried to create when he bought the team. but, Marty felt he had a good enough team to compete, so he didnt spend. Spurrier wanted quick players, so he went and go the players he wanted. Gibbs wanted certain players and wanted to get rid of certain players, that is what has happened. what ever Joe wants, Joe is going to get. Maybe dan can say no once in a while, but the chemistry thing can be put on the owner. Its up to the coaches and "core redskins" to promote that chemistry. What you can blame snyder for was firing and hiring coaches like he did. but not now. this falls squarely on the coaches and players.

[PoundIt]

No. Youre right. The age thing is not the factor it was. Springs is getting up there, being an injury prone 31. Big Joe is only 31. Some of our linemen are into their 30's. Arch looks like an old 28, maybe he just sucks. Maybe the point should not be as much about age as it should be about lack of chemistry.