PrismmmMMMMmmmm, good! NOT!

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

air surveillance should required a signed warrant. Im more pissed drones flying around my house than the nsa thing.

My initial thought is data mining call data doesnt bother me one bit, but if they are recording and listening in on calls...i thought that took a judge signed warrant? If their listening in without it, isnt that illegal????


And this weasel flying all around isnt a hero in my book but a coward who has committed a crime. I dont care if we put a bullet in his head

even when a warrant is "required," they have a 99.7% approval rate (or something like that, so the whole thing is buggered anyways. that's part of the problem - saying "we think he may or may not be somehow involved in something, maybe" now qualifies as actionable.