Trayvon Martin Case - Commanders Post at The Warpath

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop

Commanders Post at The Warpath > Off-Topic Discussion > Debating with the enemy

Trayvon Martin Case

User Name Remember Me?

Password

Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar

Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here.

Go to Page...

Trayvon Martin Case

Debating with the enemy

Thread Tools Display Modes

Prev Next

07-13-2013, 05:47 PM #11

CRedskinsRule

Living Legend

Join Date: Aug 2008

Age: 59

Posts: 21,744

Re: Trayvon Martin Case

outside the courthouse

Chico, I disagree about the adult/child designation. At 17, if the role was reversed, he would have been charged as an adult. From 16-21 our country is awash in mixed signals about minor vs adult, but when someone uses the term "child" for a 17 yo teen male, it's a tad misleading. This coming from the father of a 16 yo teen "boy".

CRedskinsRule

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by CRedskinsRule

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Show Printable Version

Display Modes

Switch to Linear Mode

Switch to Hybrid Mode

Threaded Mode

Posting Rules

You may not post new threads

You may not post replies

You may not post attachments

You may not edit your posts

BB code is On

Smilies are On

[IMG] code is On

HTML code is Off

Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 AM.

Contact Us - Commanders Post at The Warpath - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 1.67762 seconds with 11 queries

07-13-2013, 05:47 PM	#11
CRedskinsRule Living Legend Join Date: Aug 2008 Age: 59 Posts: 21,744	Re: Trayvon Martin Case outside the courthouse Chico, I disagree about the adult/child designation. At 17, if the role was reversed, he would have been charged as an adult. From 16-21 our country is awash in mixed signals about minor vs adult, but when someone uses the term "child" for a 17 yo teen male, it's a tad misleading. This coming from the father of a 16 yo teen "boy".