Five-year-old boy accidentally shoots, kills sister

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by Giantone

(lol) ....or as everyone else calls them, facts .

What facts? All you do is throw out poorly thought-out arguments.

I mean, you never responded to this:

Originally Posted by HailGreen28

nother logic fail on your part, giantone. Of course, everybody sane would call that shooters nuts. He's no longer "law abiding" as you put it, now is he?

So what are you trying to say, in response to calling only the shooter nuts, that all gun owners should be considered nuts until proven otherwise?

Originally Posted by Giantone

Like this one ....
Iowa grants gun permits to the blind

Iowa grants gun permits to the blind

DES MOINES, Iowa -- Here's some news that has law enforcement officials and lawmakers scratching their heads:
Iowa is granting permits to acquire or carry guns in public to people who are legally or completely blind.
No one questions the legality of the permits. State law does not allow sheriffs to deny an Iowan the right to carry a weapon based on physical ability.
The quandary centers squarely on public safety. Advocates for the disabled and Iowa law enforcement officers disagree over whether it's a good idea for visually disabled Iowans to have weapons.

Not sure where you're going with this.... For example, legally blind doesn't always mean total blindness. Some "legally blind" people can pass DMV eye tests with corrective lenses. Another situation: What if someone experienced at a shooting range who used to be able to see clearly, wants to go back with assistance from a friend who is also proficient?

But there you go again relying on knee-jerks and poorly thought-out statements, giantone.