Redskins Vs Eagles Pregame Thread

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

I think the main difference between the two, is Foles is good with the potential to be great, Kolb is matt flynn with potential to be worse

The thing about Kolb was always potential. He wasn't great in Philadelphia, but looked competent, and some guys if you take them out of the framework of the WCO, they thrive. That was the belief on Kolb at least.

The Cardinals not only didn't have the framework to win with Kolb, they couldn't even keep him upright.

Foles was a great college quarterback who had some down moments as a rookie, but I thought he was the best player on their roster at QB going into the season. I figured we were really fortunate to draw Michael Vick in week 1. We were...it just didn't matter.