![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 55
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Ramsey and McCants
Quote:
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 481
|
Re: Ramsey and McCants
From today's Washington Post,
Yesterday, the only question Ramsey declined to answer concerned his turnover issues (two touchdowns and four interceptions) during preseason games. Ramsey was intercepted once Sunday by the Chicago Bears and, according to another offensive starter who requested anonymity, that interception -- on Ramsey's second pass of the game -- occurred when a receiver ran the wrong route, adding to Ramsey's frustration about the decision. So Ramsey Bashers, and Brunell believers, what do you have to say now? I don't think a single person on this forum even entertained the possibility that the WR ran the wrong route and suprise the pass looks bad, when the WR is not there! I am glad the players are coming out, for now there is a record and no way in hell should Gibbs be given nine games of Brunell to ruin the season AGAIN! Someone, and most likely it will have to be Snyder is going to have to have to say something. This is why we need a GM, like said before Gibbs coach GOOD, Gibbs coach & GM BAD. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 55
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Ramsey and McCants
Quote:
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 124
|
Re: Ramsey and McCants
No I think the point being made is that Gibbs is hoping that Brunell is the QB he was expecting. The thing that annoys me the most is that Gibbs has already made his mind about Ramsey. Ramsey seemed in command and made some key 3rd down conversions. For all Gibbs talk about core players and all, he seems to be quite good at turning player away from this organization. Smoot and Pierce are gone and now so will Ramsey
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 481
|
Re: Ramsey and McCants
Quote:
Yes this is blasphemy to some, but these illogical decisions by Gibbs the GM are getting to be too much, and some may have long term negative consequences on the team. Everyone talks about the three rings, but there was always a GM to counterbalance things on those Superbowl winning teams. I remember when the Redskins were the model franchise and always had the knack for acquiring a key player via Plan-B free agency. Now our front office is a running joke within the NFL. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Ramsey and McCants
Quote:
I went back and watched most of the Bears game last night, and while Ramsey did look good at times, he also looked pretty bad at others. He fired several overthrows and just doesn't look very decisive at times. That's pretty much been the book on him his entire career. He's inconsistent. He'll thrill you on one play and kill you the next. He's the kind of QB that drives Gibbs crazy. I just don't see why there's such an uproar over this. As bad as Brunell was last year, Ramsey was only slightly better. Ramsey seems like a good guy, and he's a very likable guy. I think we really wanted him to succeed, but right now Gibbs feels that a change would be beneficial to the team, so let's roll with that for now and see where it takes us. I really don't see what we have to lose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Ramsey and McCants
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Ramsey and McCants
Quote:
Brunell had his chance to endear himself to us as fans all of last season. if he looked good, do you think any of us would be 'freaking out' as you say? emotional attachment is secondary. unless it applies to blind faith in Gibbs of course, that emotional attachment is allowed. go back and find some video of Brunell's passes last season against real defenses really trying to murder him. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|