'Skins-Cowboys Game thread 9/19/05

[PSUSkinsFan21]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Maybe I am missing your point, or maybe it's just incredibly lame.

I could see your argument if Ramsey had a nice winning percentage... some sort of solid proof he's a proven winner.

He's 3-4 under Gibbs and 9-14 for his career. Sorry if that fails to impress me. He sucks a little less than Brunell... that's really something to hang your hat on.

No, see I think the problem is you just refuse to admit that Gibbs is not perfect. He made the wrong call. You can't give me one decent reason for starting Brunell over Ramsey. The numbers don't add up. I'm not saying Ramsey is great, but can you tell me why you don't start the guy that is better in every single category? Why don't you start the guy who wins just a little more often? Why don't you start the QB with a better passer rating, more yards per attempt and completion, more total yards...etc, etc, etc??? Just tell me why you choose to start the worse option of the two. Please tell me.

I mean maybe I'm way off here, but I thought the reason you play games is to win........so why not at least give yourself the best chance possible, even if that chance still isn't good? Aren't we trying to win games here?