Tuck Rule - Commanders Post at The Warpath

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop

Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Tuck Rule

User Name Remember Me?

Password

Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion

Go to Page...

Tuck Rule

Locker Room Main Forum

Thread Tools Display Modes

Prev Next

10-09-2005, 09:48 PM #7

kingerock

Special Teams

Join Date: Apr 2004

Location: Killeen, TX

Age: 50

Posts: 360

Re: Tuck Rule

the thing that gets me is that if they intended to throw it there was no eligible receiver anywhere close and it should be a grounding penalty. The rule is dumb to me because it's win-win for the QB and lose-lose for the defense.

__________________
Redskins fan lost in Texas for 20 years. Need a ride to D.C.

kingerock

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by kingerock

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Show Printable Version

Display Modes

Switch to Linear Mode

Switch to Hybrid Mode

Threaded Mode

Posting Rules

You may not post new threads

You may not post replies

You may not post attachments

You may not edit your posts

BB code is On

Smilies are On

[IMG] code is On

HTML code is Off

Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:42 AM.

Contact Us - Commanders Post at The Warpath - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 1.26774 seconds with 11 queries

10-09-2005, 09:48 PM	#7
kingerock Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Killeen, TX Age: 50 Posts: 360	Re: Tuck Rule the thing that gets me is that if they intended to throw it there was no eligible receiver anywhere close and it should be a grounding penalty. The rule is dumb to me because it's win-win for the QB and lose-lose for the defense. __________________ Redskins fan lost in Texas for 20 years. Need a ride to D.C.