Tuck Rule

Paintrain · 10-10-2005, 07:52 AM

Well unfortunately, as the rule is written that was the correct call.. There wasn't a problem with the call, the problem is with the rule.. A logical amendment to the rule should be, once the ball is below the shoulder it's no longer considered forward movement of the arm and therefore if the QB loses the ball it is a fumble. That would eliminate all the inconsistency on the calls. It's easy to identify on replay and will make even the idiots officials like Tom White look like they know what they are doing..

10-10-2005, 07:52 AM	#24
Paintrain Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Age: 55 Posts: 5,006	Re: Tuck Rule Well unfortunately, as the rule is written that was the correct call.. There wasn't a problem with the call, the problem is with the rule.. A logical amendment to the rule should be, once the ball is below the shoulder it's no longer considered forward movement of the arm and therefore if the QB loses the ball it is a fumble. That would eliminate all the inconsistency on the calls. It's easy to identify on replay and will make even the idiots officials like Tom White look like they know what they are doing.. __________________ Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman

Tuck Rule

Locker Room Main Forum