Who's this ass clown?

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by hurrykaine

That's my point - we watch every skins possession with bated breath only because we're emotionally invested in the skins. A neutral fan of the game would not consider our offense exciting - despite the fact that we have exciting individual players like Portis and Moss.

That's said, this could all change over the course of the season, and we could join the list of exciting offenses like the colts, giants, eagles, chiefs, chargers, seahawks, rams (until lately), and some of these teams could drop out from the list.

Who cares if we are an exciting O if we keep winning games I don't mind. How about those exciting Rams & Vikings O. Its better to be thought a fool than to speek and remove a doubt.They should remind these writers of this.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by firstdown

Who cares if we are an exciting O if we keep winning games I don't mind. How about those exciting Rams & Vikings O. Its better to be thought a fool than to speek and remove a doubt.They should remind these writers of this.

they'd tell you a fool with a paycheck is better than a possible fool that's broke.

[#56fanatic]

this dude obviously hasn't a clue on what the SKINS mentality is. Pound you until you give in. Now back in the hayday we offered a little more deep balls, but our running game is no where close to what it use to be. Until we can make people respect our ability to hit you deep, our running game is going to struggle some what. Once they start respecting the deep threat, Portis will start breaking off those 150 yard games we are use to seeing from him. Also, look for Patten to have a big day this week, I just feel they are not going to let Moss get deep, and may lose focus on our other deep ball threats. You say a little of that last week, on the bogus pass interference call in the endzone against Patten.

[SkinsRock]

My guess is that he has not actually watched any Skins games, probably with the exception of the first half of the Dallas game, so he's basing his assertions primarily off of last year's performance. Don't we, after only 4 games, have close to as many, if not more long passes this year than all of last year? Yeah, the scoring hasn't been what we'd like, but if the offense keeps doing what they're doing, it will...my bet is it begins this week against a weak KC defense.

[FRPLG]

Another example of a moron journalist. I'd be ok if he didn't work for the foremost sports journalism magzine in the country. They're suppose to know something about sports and this guy obviously does not. If he had seen us play this year he'd know we don't have a "dink and dunk" offense, our QB play has been at least OK, and jesus man Gibbs has 3 SBs so he can't be "clueless". Just another media lemming throwing in on an issue he has no idea what the hell he is talking about. And all the crap about being "just a fan"? Well buddy I am "just a fan" and I don't get to write for SI. Writing for SI makes you something different than a "fan". It makes you a journalist who has at least a modicum of responsibility to write with you know like COMPETENCY on whatever it is you are writing about.

[saskin]

I was born in 88 so I don't know the answer to this but I'm just wondering.....was our offense under Gibbs 1 awesome and called one of the greater ones? Or were the games like they are now? (meaning close)

[BigSKINBauer]

yeah i was born back then too. I wish i could have seen the glory days, you old folks should consider yourselves lucky. C'mon gibbs win one for the millenium generation