Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


P/S week 2. Packers thread

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-18-2017, 10:45 AM   #10
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread

On the “wakeup call” last week and if he has changed anything about how the team will prepare for Week 1:

“We’re still preparing. We’re still preparing the same way. We’re going to get these guys prepared. I just think when you talk about ‘wakeup call,’ I just think everybody has to come out and understand the other team has an agenda also. We didn’t match the same agenda, and that’s probably my fault.

Quotes: Jay Gruden (08-16-2017)


I heard Gruden say this in the press conf the other day. Does this mean that the skins knew the ravens would probably be calling their blitz/pressure D plays but we would be calling non extra pass pro plays? We would run plays not caring what the D formation was?
---------------------------------
On if he has decided how long the starters will play against Green Bay:

“I have not. You know, it'll be a feeling out there on Saturday, really. I intend on them playing a little bit more than normal, probably, but we'll see how it goes.”

Quotes: Jay Gruden (08-17-2017)
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.69214 seconds with 11 queries