Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Trent Williams holding out for new deal

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Should the Redskins pay or trade Trent Williams?
Pay him 34 46.58%
Trade him 39 53.42%
Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-07-2019, 02:33 PM   #1
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Trent Williams holding out for new deal

The exception comes with star players, that's their leverage. Otherwise holdouts would never work. Star players get their way more often than not.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 06-07-2019, 02:47 PM   #2
sandtrapjack
The Starter
 
sandtrapjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
Re: Trent Williams holding out for new deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
The exception comes with star players, that's their leverage. Otherwise holdouts would never work. Star players get their way more often than not.
I will concede your point. But the only time it has worked in the players favor was when Emmitt Smith held out in 1993. Smith held out for the first 2 weeks of the regular season, and the Cowboys started out 0-2. Smith got his payday that week and Dallas went 14-2 after that.

BUT>....that was a different time and a different CBA. I cannot recall a recent holdout except for LaVeon Bell. But Steelers run game did not slip too much without Bell last season.
sandtrapjack is offline  
Old 06-07-2019, 03:04 PM   #3
Tennskinsfan
Camp Scrub
 
Tennskinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 53
Re: Trent Williams holding out for new deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack View Post
I will concede your point. But the only time it has worked in the players favor was when Emmitt Smith held out in 1993. Smith held out for the first 2 weeks of the regular season, and the Cowboys started out 0-2. Smith got his payday that week and Dallas went 14-2 after that.

BUT>....that was a different time and a different CBA. I cannot recall a recent holdout except for LaVeon Bell. But Steelers run game did not slip too much without Bell last season.
That’s the thing out Oline would dramatically be downgraded without TW out there. With him continuing to age and his injury history. I would rather put him on the trading block and see what’s out there while he is still worth something than to have him be this years Mason Foster. His position and the lack of depth we have there puts quite a bit of power in his hands. Yes the Redskins hold his fate but he can put forth the bare minimum and we lose all around.
Tennskinsfan is offline  
Old 06-07-2019, 03:49 PM   #4
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Trent Williams holding out for new deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack View Post
I will concede your point. But the only time it has worked in the players favor was when Emmitt Smith held out in 1993. Smith held out for the first 2 weeks of the regular season, and the Cowboys started out 0-2. Smith got his payday that week and Dallas went 14-2 after that.

BUT>....that was a different time and a different CBA. I cannot recall a recent holdout except for LaVeon Bell. But Steelers run game did not slip too much without Bell last season.
Usually it doesn't get to holdout, players renegotiate deals all the time
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.86504 seconds with 12 queries