Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Dwayne Haskins preseason thread

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Thoughts on Haskins' preseason debut
Impressed! 7 12.96%
He's about where I expected him to be 39 72.22%
Disappointed but still optimistic 4 7.41%
He's a bust 4 7.41%
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-10-2019, 07:44 PM   #11
WCommandersfan99
The Starter
 
WCommandersfan99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 2,124
Re: Dwayne Haskins preseason thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
But at some point this preseason if Haskins does not clearly demonstrate on the field and stat sheet that he has earned/won the the starting QB job over Keenum, it will be interesting to see what the FO and coaches do. Will we start Keenum because he is better prepared at this point and gives us the better chance to win? Or will Haskins be given the position regardless of the play on the field, because Haskins was drafted high, he is the future and he will sell tickets?
Under this scenario, I think they'd start Keenum. Redskins nation is excited about Haskins, but am I the only one who feels there was more hype for RGIII? Haskins is going to be very good, no doubt, he just needs more experience. I do like Gruden with qbs and offense. I wanna see Keenum get a fair shake.
WCommandersfan99 is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.77846 seconds with 12 queries