Supreme Court vacancy

[SunnySide]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Post the headline from your article. Refinery29 is a trash fucking site who posted the fake new handsmaid tale article from Newsweek before they retracted it.

This is the headline: This Is Amy Coney Barrett, The Potential RBG Replacement Who Hates Your Uterus

Full of bias and weak language peddling assumptions, not based in fact


If we aren’t smart enough to see what’s going on here, I can’t help ya

I used that exert because it was directly quoting her ... I didnt quote any of the editorial stuff because that just writer view point and opinion. I just wanted to add a small nugget quote from her to give some validity to her being pro-life. I try to source stuff when I can. And it is 100% fine if she is pro-life but as a SCOTUS justice, she needs to follow the law and Roe is the law. Discussing that has merit imo.

I admit, Im having trouble following or starting a discussion of any actual merit on here. I made a lengthy post about "freedom of religion", that was ignored and thats fine. I made this post about a SC nominee following the law of the land vs their own beliefs and I imagine that will get 0 traction as well. And its totally cool. People will talk about what they want to talk about.

im just having trouble following people on here the last few days. Thats a me problem.