![]() |
![]() |
#946 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
Quote:
Hey...we've been bringing everyone else back...Fuller, Flowers...why not?
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#947 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 4,568
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
Quote:
Charles - his body screams G. Weight is in the 77th percentile for OL, arm length is 28th %, height is 33%. itd be amazing if he panned out as a solid LT but everything seems to indicate G. I dont know ... Flowers isnt worth the cap money and I dont like seeing even more resources going to a position already over saturated while we are barren at LT. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#948 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,850
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
Wait....we didn’t get Flowers for him to return to Tackle?
Awwwww hell nawwwwww
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#949 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 4,568
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
Quote:
2020 - Ngakoue was was tagged and traded for a 2R. 2019 - Clowney was tagged and traded for 2 players and a 3R Clark + 3R = 1R, 3r and future 2R ----------------- Seems like a 2R would be great, more likely a 3R and 4R ------------- well see .. maybe this is their way of addressing the piss poor interior run game .. but Flowers isnt really a mauler like Scherff. Hes more like Wes, decent enough but not an impact player |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#950 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 419
|
Ereck Flowers Trade - Grade
Ereck Flowers - G - B Grade
First, what Flowers is: a mauler in the run game. Second, what Flowers isn't: a pass blocker. This despite being drafted #9 at LT. Giants FO absolute imbeciles. He simply, like Scherff, did not have the foot speed and innate quickness to play LT. Whether he could play RT is questionable. He was an absolute turnstile every time placed on edge, and he got absolutely torched so many times playing for Giants it staggers imagination, and I don't even watch that many Giants games (Skins fan baby). He is most likely brought in to play LG. Flowers has more natural strength and athleticism than Schweitzer, by a long shot. Yet for whatever reason, that hasn't always translated into success. It did the year he played here, however. We really struggled to run the ball last year, especially up the gut against any non-losing team. This is in part because our statistical paper tiger offensive line isn't nearly as good as stats suggest, and had stats padded by beating up on suck ass teams. The first thing this tells you is that our FO is smart enough to realize this, which is good news. Whether this is the optimal fix, who knows, but with mediocrity like Fitz-Average at QB, an absence of strong running game and inability to run up gut will be kiss of death. There are a few ways you can look at this. Flowers, if you understand what he is and isn't and actually coach and play to his strengths (i.e. competent coaching), is a young, good guard. Not a world beater, but way more than average, and above above average if coached und used properly. He's 27 and already had his birthday this year, so is in his prime. He has generally been healthy. He is probably 50% to 80% of what Scherff is, at half the price. He can Maul like Scherff, Flowers at his best, though is not as consistent or as athletic as Scherff. Like Scherff, Flowers is serviceable when he can get his hands on a pass rusher, but like Scherff if he can't it is over. They are not necessarily comparable players, but are eerily similar in this regard. Flowers is another guy that looked WAY better than he was by playing at big program stacked with talent, in college. Moreover, though the details of trade haven't been released, this appears to be a cap dump trade by Miami, meaning we probably didn't surrender a pick, but rather moved up or down with late round picks. We thus gave up very little or nothing in draft capital, acquired a player with 3 years left in his prime, with our primary cost being money. The Dolphins have very little cap space, and their cap now, with WRs and CBs and a number of good but not great players hogging cap space, is perhaps a warning story of what our cap may look like next year or year after. Flowers would have been 5th or 6th highest paid player on their roster, and he significantly underplayed his contract, this and low leverage of position made dumping his cap a no brainer. Problem is even though the $9M bonus was mostly applied last year, the non-bonus part of contract appears to be guaranteed this year, so we're on the hook for $9M (same amount as bonus not to confused) it looks like, having executed trade, and can't really cut him, as his entire salary looks to be dead cap if we do. After this year we can cut him no cost, or pay him $8M. Not positive on that, but that's what it looks like. We are not doing too bad cap-wise, with $18M - $22M in cap space before signing rookies, depending whose numbers you believe. Next year we have $50M in cap space, another $6.5M if we cut Collins, $56.5, but probably about $40M if we resign Allen, which I think we will and should. Erring on low side with cap space estimate, don't think we pay Allen $20M a year. We could conceivably pay Scherff $18M a year and still have $20M in cap space next year. Not saying I think we will pay Scherff or should. Bottom line, keeping Scherff and Allen and Flowers is viable next year, with $20M in cap space still, though with no QB being paid. Our cap problems really start the year after and the year after, when we have enough good players end of rookie deals that resigning them all becomes really challenging. Right now basically only our 1st round picks need resigning, because our drafting has sucked so bad. Soon we have 2nd and 3rd round picks, McL, Gibson, etc., that also need new deals, and you ultimately just can't sign them all. Kind of problem you want to have, good teams have, means drafting well, and if you aren't signing 10 FAs a year, you then work comp system and start getting comp picks. We now have $18M on Scherff, $9M on Flowers, $5M on Schweitz this year, $1M on Martin. That's $33M, or about 17% of our ADJUSTED $199M cap with $15M rollover. That is obviously ridiculous, and too high. One sixth of our salary cap is being spent on G, with no incredibly dominant player except one who is never healthy. We also have Roul at C counting $5M this year, and then $10M next year, $11M year after, $12M year after. Next year if we had Scherff at say $18M, Flowers at $8M, and Roul at $10M that is $36M on center of OL. That's with an expected cap of $192M before rollover, which would be 19% of cap on three interior OL positions. That's a lot, especially with none being elite, except Scherff who should be in the Unbreakable movie sequel. But it is not obscenely untenable. So what does it mean? What is FO thinking? 1. First of all, that a player that they had no way of knowing would be available, who became available, was a significant upgrade over current players (Schweitz Martin), without surrendering much or any draft capital, because a suckfest team did not know how to manage their cap. You upgrade and add talent via every and any means necessary, you have tons of holes, more than picks, so you can fill one, you do so. Even if at G, and especially with no dead money after this year if you let him walk, and potential comp pick if you do. 2. Brandon Scherff insurance. If he's hurt (when isn't he) or doesn't resign, you have some sort of succession plan at G, and at least one proven player who is more than JAG. Meaning he can't completely hold you hostage. 3. The FO must not love Martin. They have had two chances now to let him start, let Scherff walk, or not sign/trade Flowers, but did not take either. 4. Schweitz can be cut this year for $2M or next year for $1M. If we keep both Flowers Scherff next year, Schweitz toast. 5. One could also interpret this as Charles being viewed more as T, or wanting to spend time developing there with both our starting Ts being average or aging or soon FAs. There is some sense to focusing on developing him at T, RT at worst, and starting him and letting Moses or Lucas walk. You start him at G you never fully develop him at T, a much higher leverage position with much greater talent deficit now after Flowers trade especially. 6. If there is any serious consideration of keeping Scherff, Roull, and Flowers, then you have to address T through draft. There simply will not be enough money for all 3 and big money for FA T, even one of our own, especially if we don't have a rookie QB and have to pay one again next year. The FO cannot know how contract negotiations with Scherff will go, and I think this trade gets made irrespective because no real risk, no massive draft capital, and can cut after this year no dead money. If Flowers blows it up and becomes dominant again this year as he was for us previous, he's good value at $9M the year after, and if not we cut him and have lost nothing. A FO that really needs to focus on LB, S, LT, RT, QB has bigger fish to fry this year so even getting 1-2 years of solid production at half or less what Scherff costs is a win. In the best case scenario, the dream scenario, you draft a franchise LT this year, Flowers plays like 80% of Scherff and the absolute mauler in the run game he has potential to be, at half the cost, and maybe you resign Scherff, keep Flowers, keep Roull, and then start rookie T and Charles at whichever T position they are best suited for. You might then be talking a very dominant OL, starting to approach what DL is. Maybe Flowers wasn't a true first round talent, but he had some elite athletic traits that made him at least a 3rd rounder, and we just got what is essentially a 2nd-day-pick caliber player (at G) for no draft capital. You have to call that a win, but not an A, because we're still paying him a lot, we only have him under contract for 2 years meaning if he blows it up we have to pay him big or let him walk, and could very well re-bust. Or re-re-bust, depending how you view it, LOL. The bottom line (lame pun possibly unintended or at least subconscious) is that our o-line is not nearly as good as the stats suggest and consistently got owned by better teams. We have to correct this. We can't pick and choose what talented players become available via trades or cuts, but were smart to pounce in this case. The trade has upside, but also cost, though no long-term risk and no mortgaging the future surrendering picks. It thus earns a solid B, especially because if Scherff leaves we have at least one mauler at G remaining. Long term, I still favor building through draft, and not spending piles on lower leverage positions, but we still need 20-25 players (not counting 1 year stopgaps) and have 8 draft picks. Beggars can't be choosers, you have to improve talent anyway you can, such as in this case. Another final thought is that if we don't draft a QB that becomes franchise, we'll need to sign one next year, barring Heinecke panning out, which we'll of course never get to determine starting Fitz-Average. Quality of OL is a major factor for FA QBs, or even helping development of younger QB. Anyhoo, bit too long, but this is a solid B grade with significant though not monumental upside, and no long-term risk or mortgaging future. We are much more talented at G today than we were yesterday, and can be MUCH more comfortable not backing up the Brinks truck for Scherff if it comes to that. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#951 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
While I'd love for BS to stick around long term, it really looks like we're being played by the same tactic Kirk Cousins used.
We're already paying too much for a Guard on the tag, and since he hasn't budged and signed long term, it appears he's bolting after this season. So instead of overpaying for a Guard this year that we're losing anyways, I fully support getting something in return for him right now.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#952 |
The Starter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK, South
Posts: 1,926
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
Looks like his salary this year is guaranteed, which is not great but maybe Miami ate some of the cost 🤔
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#953 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 4,568
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
From what Ive seen from Flowers .. he is not a mauler imo. Hes doesnt get great push off the line, doesnt have a great punch and doesnt get to the second level well. Only great Gs have those 3 traits so its not some huge knock on the guy ...
Hes an average player imo. A C+ player. What he has in physical abilities over Wes, Wes seems to have over him mentally. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#954 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,412
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
Since the WFT hasn't been able to sign Sherff long-term, they may plan to trade him as part of the package to move up and pick a QB in the draft. That may be the elephant in the room. Also, regarding Flowers, $18M - $10M = $8M saved. Oh my Goodness, could it be about the money - again?!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#955 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,412
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#956 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 419
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
Quote:
Flowers certainly mauled some people year he played for us. Certainly no Scherff, but way better than Schweitz--if he regains form he had with us. Miami such a clown show tough to tell. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#957 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 4,568
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
He did, he played well enough but I think fans here over valued him bc we had low expectations and he managed to beat those low expectations. We expected a disaster and he played at a starter level and played better than Lauvaua who was a disaster.
We were all shocked when the Phins gave him 3/30 and were happy the Skins didnt match that. Now Phins fans are happy to get some cap space back with this trade. Flowers is a C+ player imo. Nothing wrong with that .... if he was making 4-5M and we didnt already have a C+ guard in Wes making 5M ... on top of the other guard making 18M. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#958 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,597
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
By the time i post this they will probably announce what the swap is.
![]() But here are Miami's picks and ours this year: Miami- Round 3:*No. 81 Round 5:*No. 156 (from Cowboys through Eagles) Round 7:*Nos. 231 (from Texans), 258 (from Chiefs) WFT- Round 3:*Nos. 74 (from 49ers), 82 Round 4:*No. 124 Round 5:*No. 163 Round 7:*Nos. 244 (from Vegas), 246 Assuming Miami benefits from dumping cap, what is 8M cap relief worth? We get 156 they get 163? 244? The way the two teams picks line up I don't see many options. Though I would love if we got 81 and they got 124!!! Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#959 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 713
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
I just see 26 million per year for 2 guards and think why would they add 9 million if they didn't think they could do something with the 17 million that Scherff is getting . . . thats a TON of $$$ for 2 guards!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#960 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,850
|
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
This
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|