Quote:
Originally Posted by simbosargos75
It's very possible that Haskins will have been the better pick. If the Giants give Danny a big 2nd contract and he continues to be terrible, the Redskins will have been better off drafting a bum that they never paid any real money.
|
Jones that year is in some ways like Jones this year, much less athletic prospect with much less upside. Haskins has some elite athletic traits, Jones had none.
Tough to determine which player is more of a waste from a long-term perspective, FitzAverage or Jones. Certainly Fitz, as we didn't waste a top-10 pick on him.