The Most Fresh & Cordial Political Thread Ever

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

You can't seriously think anonymous twitter user @acyn is a reliable source.

??? Rolling Stone does.



Rolling Stone
@RollingStone
Fox News doctored clips of Obama's visit to the White House to make it seem like Biden was lost.

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by Giantone

??? Rolling Stone does.



Rolling Stone
@RollingStone
Fox News doctored clips of Obama's visit to the White House to make it seem like Biden was lost.

Much like most things you miss the point. One clip from Fox does not evidence make nor does one clip that can be taken out of context from CSPAN provide evidence to the contrary. A twitter user that wasn't even there? That is click bait fodder at best.

I think it is easy enough to identify when Fox News is lying without looking like a douche bag and coming off as an idiot.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

Much like most things you miss the point. One clip from Fox does not evidence make nor does one clip that can be taken out of context from CSPAN provide evidence to the contrary. A twitter user that wasn't even there? That is click bait fodder at best.

I think it is easy enough to identify when Fox News is lying without looking like a douche bag and coming off as an idiot.

How many clips do you give FOX , two , three, 10?I get it you wanna act like an ass and not believe it that's your choice, cool . FOX has doctored videos' of Biden before .Not past them to do it again.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...-satchel-paige

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by Giantone

How many clips do you give FOX , two , three, 10?I get it you wanna act like an ass and not believe it that's your choice, cool . FOX has doctored videos' of Biden before .Not past them to do it again.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...-satchel-paige

Once again missing the point. There were plenty of first person accounts of what happened yet you chose to use an unreliable source a random internet poster, just because it is correct doesn't mean it's credible. Your posting of random shit gets nauseating when you could provide evidence with credible first hand sources.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

Once again missing the point. There were plenty of first person accounts of what happened yet you chose to use an unreliable source a random internet poster, just because it is correct doesn't mean it's credible. Your posting of random shit gets nauseating when you could provide evidence with credible first hand sources.

The fact you come after me yet you have no comment on chico's questionable postings explains much to me. I jump in chico's shit because he deserves it.I didn't jump into yours till you did. You don't want to believe my source ,fine, cool ,you don't have too. Again all I did was post the link to the article from Rolling Stone ,they are the ones accepting the twitter response. I find it funny that the only credible first hand source's you and others believe are the ones that follow your agenda so I understand it but your shit gets pretty sickening too.