How much trouble COULD we be in?

[Gmanc711]

I know people say the "NFL will suck" if its uncapped, but I dont think it will. First of all, I want a new CBA. I love the team we have now, and dont want to see it "blown up". We have too many core players to have to get rid of guys, and the team chemistry we have right now is somthing we havent seen in years. That being said, just on the state of the NFL as a whole if its Uncapped....


....The NFL Playoffs are god-awful when you put in all this parity. The playoffs this year were horrible overall (the skins were the only reason it was exciting for me. If they dont make it, its really boring cause the games sucked). When you look at baseball, yeah, theres a ton of teams that are basically written off cause they have shitty owners, but how freaking awsome are the baseball playoffs? They are some of the best in sports because of the lack of cap. The rivalries are made IN the playoffs, and thats what makes it so exciting. The Redskins would be one of the teams in the playoffs year in and year out because we have a good owner who is willing to make us competitive. The NFL playoffs as a whole have been shitty since the cap was instituted, and every year its a new team doing their thing, theres all new playoff teams, and its just not as fun. I'd rather see the playoffs year in and year out being alot of the same teams, buliding those awsome rivalries and close games. Like I said, I want the CBA to get signed, because were already in great shape to make a run, and I'd like to see a cap, but I'm just saying...things wont be all bad if it goes uncapped and turns into somthing like baseball. You'll see those great teams start to rise again, things will be much more competitive at the top of the league...it wont be a league of mediocrity and then just one or two great teams. Anyone understand what I'm saying?

In addition, If I'm Dan Snyder I am pissed off about revenue sharing. Why should a team who chooses to keep their stadium called "Ralph Wilson Stadium" for example, get money from a team who essencially sold out ( and I wish our stadium was still called Jack Kent Cooke), and took the money. That is the teams decision, so why should another team who dosent make the same decision have to share revenue? Just my take on the subject. :headbange