Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Another Off-Season Drought Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2006, 07:58 PM   #16
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: Another Off-Season Drought Thread

does anyone else think p manning is being very selfish with his big fat contract eating up sooo much of indys cap room?they have a good thing going and to let james walk could be their window closing
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-17-2006, 08:12 PM   #17
steveo395
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: Another Off-Season Drought Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25
does anyone else think p manning is being very selfish with his big fat contract eating up sooo much of indys cap room?they have a good thing going and to let james walk could be their window closing
i heard he is going to restructure this year, which he should definitely do if he wants to win
steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 09:57 PM   #18
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Another Off-Season Drought Thread

vick has any even worse contract and he's not even that good...
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2006, 12:49 AM   #19
steveo395
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: Another Off-Season Drought Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
vick has any even worse contract and he's not even that good...
yea vick is rediculous...hes not that good and he has like a $120 million contract or something....they overpaid for him so much
steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2006, 12:31 PM   #20
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
Re: Another Off-Season Drought Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
vick has any even worse contract and he's not even that good...
Nah, Manning's contract is better than Vicks and has more guaranteed money and is evenly spread base salary.

Manning: 98 million contract, 34.5 million signing bonus and 19 million in roster bonuses over seven year period. Unless they cut him he'll earn 53.5 million in bonus money over 7 years.

Vick: 130 million contract, 7.5 million signing bonus and 29.5 roster bonus (22.5 million already earned) over a period of 10 years. Vick will earn 37 million in bonus money over a ten year span.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2006, 03:02 PM   #21
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Another Off-Season Drought Thread

you're right, manning averages 16mill a year and vick is only 13mill a year average. I forgot it was a 10 year deal.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2006, 03:40 PM   #22
steveo395
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: Another Off-Season Drought Thread

vick is still overpaid though
steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2006, 04:15 PM   #23
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Another Off-Season Drought Thread

definately.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2006, 06:00 PM   #24
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: Another Off-Season Drought Thread

You think hes overrated? Try living in Atlanta. Saying anything bad about Vick is comprable to treason.

But its like you guys said. Why don't players get more endorsement deals. I sware sometimes I think Mannings trying to buy his own country or something (high NFL contract along with endorsements by Visa, Gatorade, and Microsoft). I can understand why a LB or an OL would be out to get as much as they can from their team since they're not nearly as marketable but as far as WR, RB, and QB is concerned, come on, help your team out, get the equivalent of 3 or 4 game checks by shooting a 30 second commercial.

On a side note: Does anyone know if built-in contract incentives count against the cap? I heard somewhere that they don't.
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2006, 09:59 PM   #25
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Another Off-Season Drought Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359
I can understand why a LB or an OL would be out to get as much as they can from their team since they're not nearly as marketable but as far as WR, RB, and QB is concerned, come on, help your team out, get the equivalent of 3 or 4 game checks by shooting a 30 second commercial.

On a side note: Does anyone know if built-in contract incentives count against the cap? I heard somewhere that they don't.
likely to be earned (stuff they did the year before) count in that years cap and unlikely count the year after they're earned... that's what i remember anyways.

brady insisted his oline be in his commercial too so those guys got some extra money...
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.56016 seconds with 12 queries