#2 WR Position - Commanders Post at The Warpath

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop

Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

#2 WR Position

User Name Remember Me?

Password

Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion

Go to Page...

#2 WR Position

Locker Room Main Forum

Thread Tools Display Modes

Prev Next

02-27-2006, 01:37 PM #17

Sean Taylor is God

Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2006

Posts: 68

Re: #2 WR Position

I wasn't implying Patten is bad. I think he is our second best WR. However, I also think we would be greatly served in getting a guy who is more of a quality stand-alone receiver, rather than a good decoy. Moulds is good but probably too costly.

Sean Taylor is God

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by Sean Taylor is God

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Show Printable Version

Display Modes

Switch to Linear Mode

Switch to Hybrid Mode

Threaded Mode

Posting Rules

You may not post new threads

You may not post replies

You may not post attachments

You may not edit your posts

BB code is On

Smilies are On

[IMG] code is On

HTML code is Off

Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 PM.

Contact Us - Commanders Post at The Warpath - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 2.16572 seconds with 11 queries

02-27-2006, 01:37 PM	#17
Sean Taylor is God Registered User Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 68	Re: #2 WR Position I wasn't implying Patten is bad. I think he is our second best WR. However, I also think we would be greatly served in getting a guy who is more of a quality stand-alone receiver, rather than a good decoy. Moulds is good but probably too costly.