Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Can any Secondary slow the skins down? NO.

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-11-2006, 01:20 PM   #11
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: Can any Secondary slow the skins down? NO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
If I'm a defensive coodinator, I don't approach the '06 Skins any differently than the '05. The threats are still the exact same players. I sit back in whatever I play, blitzing every once in awhile, making sure to jam Santana at the line, and not giving him, Cooley or Portis anything easy. I'd make the newcomers beat me.

Brunell will find them. It's up to them to make plays.
I'm really hoping you're a real NFC East Defensive coach lurking on our site looking for secrets.

That approach will get a team blown out of a game. It's easier to cover one midget receiver and a TE than it is to cover 3 or 4 WRs and a TE without letting the best RB in the NFL have wide open holes to run through.

I'm not sure there is a way to stop us, we have too many weapons.

If you want to let the new guys beat you...they WILL.

I hope the Cowboys and Giants take this approach. The Eagles aren't going to have a chance so I'm not worried about them. They could sign the Incredible Hulk and they'd still lose to us.
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.51669 seconds with 11 queries