![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Is it time to bench Brunell? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
141 | 61.84% |
Give him another week |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
37 | 16.23% |
Give him a few more weeks |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
35 | 15.35% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 6.58% |
Voters: 228. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools
![]() |
Display Modes
![]() |
![]() |
#211 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 46
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge)
Quote:
And for the people claiming that the entire offense is out of sync, I don't disagree with that statement, but poor blocking and rushing have nothing to do with Brunell throwing balls three yards short of wide open receivers. Let's see how happy the hundred million dollar trio of receivers is, when they have a combined 700 yards and two touchdowns between them, by week eight. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#212 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: Bench Brunell
I don't agree. I think there was a lot going on out there in Dallas and Mark was trying hard to protect the football and not make it worse than it was. He was playing conservative, which obviously did NOT help us, but who's calling the plays here. From where I was sitting it was run, run, run.. and third and eight and we can't make the completion. Why were we running on the first three downs if it wasn't working? We did it all night long. To me, that is a coaching issue and it isn't just Mark's problem. This is a team and everyone has to trust each other. Right now, it's looking like the players have very little trust in the play calls. I think THAT is the problem.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#213 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 45
Posts: 3,503
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge)
For those who think staying with MB is the right move I have a question for you:
When is the right time for the switch? It has been said that it could take up to 2 full seasons to learn this offense. Why are we wasting time with a qb that probably wont even be in the league in 2 years? If its gonna take that long dont you think we should go with JC now? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#214 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge)
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#215 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge)
Quote:
At least with Campbell he's an unknown commodity at this point. Which honestly isn't a bad thing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#216 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#217 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge)
Quote:
NO QB can survive with that kind of penalty calling. We lost 100 yards alone in penalties. F$#ing holding calls and interference calls, same shit that got us in the pre-season... COME ON!!! This isn't highshcool! The TEAM lost this game - period. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#218 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge)
Quote:
Portis, the D, and an extremely athletic receiver in Santana Moss -- who adjusted to several poorly underthrown passes -- glossed over what were obvious glitches in quarterback play that was overlooked by jaded fans who were lost in the glory of the playoff run. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#219 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge)
The fact is Brunell has been subpar for 2 games this season and at least the final 2 games of last season.
Coming from an objective voice, Madden, stated it best, its the personell. More specifically, the QB position. Now, that's not to say that it's all his fault. It's not. Don't you think other teams know that he can't move, run, throw like he used to. That's why teams blitz us. We don't have a playmaker at the qb position to beat it. For those who blame Saunders, look at his resume. It's pretty good. Maybe we don't have the QB. His system works. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#220 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 59
Posts: 2
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge)
Gotta put him on the bench and go with Campbell. What did we waste a #1 pick for if we are never going to use him? Now's a good time as any. I can't take another week of watching MB patt the ball 4 times and throw a 4yd pass or toss it out of bounds.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#221 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 45
Posts: 3,503
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge)
OH come on now, get effen real. Do you really believe that MB is going to win a SB? Did you watch the same game as I did last night cause Brunell cant stretch a defense and the Cowboys played 8 in the box all night because Brunell CANT beat a team deep. Portis will have a horrible season if brunell stays in at QB. teams will still play 8 in the box and dare MB to beat us. We will be 2-5 before we know it if we stay with MB. And then what, try to get Campbell to save our season? Why not give the guy a shot? This is A perfect time to see what JC has got. We should beat this team with one arm tied behind our back. I'll bet JC can throw the ball more than 30 yards.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#222 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge)
Brunell rolled into a sack at least a couple of times. Instead of stepping up in the pocket.
I don't know if we should bench Brunell. I can say that Campbell should be ready. I don't know if he is, but he is a first round pick and we gave up a LOT to get him. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#223 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge)
I think the fact that we play Houston and then Tennessee at home makes it an ideal time to get Campbell in there. Two defenses that he should be able to beat, with the first being on the road so he won't have the pressure of disappointing home fans. The timing couldn't be any better for Campbell and Brunell looks cooked.
After last night's performance I'm willing to rethink my stance on trying to trade for Favre.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#224 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge)
Quote:
A quarterback who can make defenses pay for blitzing every single down changes the complexion of the game immensely. Yeah, Campbell will throw more picks than Brunell. But right now, defenses know exactly what we're going to do, when we're going to do it. They know we can't pass if you blitz so much as ONE player at Brunell -- and they'll not suffer on iota in secondary coverage. Sooo, every D-coordinator who watches tape of the Skins offense instantly knows that they can put 7 or 8 in the box to send Brunell into sheer panic, stuff whatever semblance of a running game there is, and none of their receivers will catch a pass. There are many cracks in this foundation it's not even funny. Sometimes it's just that simple. Find a quarterback who can make defenses pay. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#225 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge)
I'm quite the Brunell supporter and still believe that our problems are far beyond the QB position, but I do also understand that last night really made the naysayers appear to be right about Mark Brunell. Let's face it, a loss against any other team would not be as bad as it is against Dallas. Do I think Brunell is playing Super Bowl caliber football? Not in the least! Neither is the offensive line, defensive line, or the secondary. I believe Portis means alot more to our team than what was previously thought. I believe Springs is also extremely important, but I also am starting to see that some of the guys we lost on our D this year were better than what maybe we had given them credit for.
Do I believe starting another QB over Brunell is going to be the key? Not unless we get better pass protection. Then..if our pass protection improves, then why take Brunell out unless he completely stinks it up with having loads of time to pass. I don't believe changing the QB is going to give this team that much of a spark and if we do, it's going to be Collins that comes in anyway....I'm not really looking forward to that!!
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|