|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-04-2006, 01:05 PM | #31 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: santana moss
The only thing that's rubbing me the wrong way with all the attention that Santana is getting, is the sports world is acting like he just popped on the scene last week. He's basically picking up right where he left off last year.
And to think, ESPN, Eric Allen in particular was singing the praises of Steve Smith because he caught ten passes in his first game back - so what!! |
Advertisements |
10-04-2006, 01:10 PM | #32 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 42
Posts: 2,762
|
Re: santana moss
I hate all the steve smith hype ... he's on par with santana in terms of production, but he plays much weaker opponents--and he gets injured too often.
|
10-04-2006, 01:30 PM | #33 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: santana moss
Quote:
And having lived in the Carolina media market last year I had to suffer through many of their games. I saw him take some big hits cause Jake hung him out to dry last year. I think Steve Smith is as good a receiver as there is in this league. Do I think he's overhyped? No. I just think Santana doesn't get enough facetime. |
|
10-04-2006, 01:37 PM | #34 |
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: santana moss
You can't say enough about Moss. Thank God somebody on the Skins had the wisdom to get him. With the huge plays he executes, he is changing the way other teams D will play us. This will have an increasingly positive affect on the other recievers. Cool
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
10-05-2006, 01:35 PM | #35 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Potomac, MD
Age: 38
Posts: 304
|
Re: santana moss
ESPN.com - NFL - Top 10 must-see performers You are just too good to be true...cant take my eyes off of you..(#4 on the list)
__________________
DaveyFoSho
|
10-05-2006, 01:39 PM | #36 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: santana moss
Quote:
|
|
10-05-2006, 01:42 PM | #37 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: santana moss
pretty good list, honestly. I expected a lot less for some reason.
|
10-05-2006, 01:46 PM | #38 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Potomac, MD
Age: 38
Posts: 304
|
Re: santana moss
I was almost as surprised as when i saw Dr. Z's Rankings...but Moss deserves it!!!! He is the best take it to the house receiver. He has all the moves. I Understand M Vick is like what Number 5 in rushing as a QB....but does he deserve #1?? Or bush #2??
__________________
DaveyFoSho
|
10-05-2006, 02:02 PM | #39 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: santana moss
Quote:
bush caused the first full sellout (ALL season tickets) the saints have EVER had. people want to see them, so they deserve to be #1 and #2. |
|
10-05-2006, 06:13 PM | #40 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: santana moss
Quote:
Still, some players take awhile to blossom. Remember, Tiki Barber was so-so for the first 3 or 4 years in the league until he became an elite running back. I think the same happened with Santana Moss. I'm just glad we have him now that he seems to be peaking. |
|
10-05-2006, 06:18 PM | #41 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: santana moss
Rod was probably the better choice at the time because Marty would have completely misused Santana
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
10-05-2006, 06:25 PM | #42 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: santana moss
yeah, marty had to use the guys he drafted, and he made it work. 8-8 in your first year isn't bad... i think he won with a lot less talent too.
we're better off now though, for sure. |
|
|