|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-07-2006, 12:23 PM | #31 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Well, I can understand wanting to do more playaction in the second half, seeing as how our running game was killing Atlanta. The problem is, I think with a young quarterback we needed to have kept with the running game a little more.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
Advertisements |
12-07-2006, 12:39 PM | #32 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
On the flip side, the only way Campbell will get better at effectively running play action (especially under pressure) is to practice it in live game situations, right?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
12-07-2006, 12:54 PM | #33 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
On a related note, did anyone catch the playaction fake JC gave at one point, I think it was in the 2nd half somewhere. He turned to his right and there was nobody there but he still gave the fake. I just thought it was funny, he obviously got crossed up.
|
12-07-2006, 05:13 PM | #34 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
To be honest, I don't think we should have had our young QB throwing 38 passes. We can't complain about the play of Campbell because in reality, he's playing exactly the way I expected him to play, like a rookie. I'm convinced however he's gaining valuable experience, and that's what it's all about.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
12-07-2006, 05:20 PM | #35 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 40
Posts: 937
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
I was saying that we should have STOPPED doing the playaction so much in the second half because the falcons were reading it. That's when we should have tried that quick slant or screen passes.
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
12-07-2006, 08:09 PM | #36 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Yeah I saw that and LOLed. Sorry guys, Im studying for finals right now and it sucks...
__________________
Vacancy |
12-07-2006, 08:34 PM | #37 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Quote:
The hogs up front have done a great job moving people off the ball in the run game, both this year and last, but as Campbell grows, I think we may have to start moving to a pass oriented blocking scheme, and might want to bring in some different linemen to do it. I'm not sure I'd bring Dock back next year. Also, when was the last time a lineman held on a run play? It always seems to be a reciever or TE getting called. But in pass protection, we get flags all the time with the front 5.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
12-07-2006, 08:36 PM | #38 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
This is the way I study for finals. Little WP action to clear the mind.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
12-07-2006, 09:12 PM | #39 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Well, I don't see anything wrong with doing playaction at all. After all, whether it is a Gibbs offense or Saunders offense, both use play action quite a bit....so it is something that Campbell has to do in a real game situation. A good screen pass works wonders if it's done right, but can be difficult for an inexperienced QB to master in the NFL.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
12-07-2006, 09:20 PM | #40 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Wait for college man, finals are insane.
__________________
Vacancy |
12-07-2006, 10:42 PM | #41 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 394
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Quote:
|
|
12-07-2006, 11:44 PM | #42 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
I'm in college...I'm just on 12 credits and 2 of em are "Football Coaching Therory"
Thus, I really have nothing to study for.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|