|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-28-2004, 08:56 PM | #31 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Wait a minute? Spurrier icon?! HOW MANY POSTS! (Don't visit the parkinglot for some time, guys!)
|
Advertisements |
08-29-2004, 01:15 AM | #32 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Quote:
|
|
08-29-2004, 01:17 AM | #33 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
You know what's sad? I've actually read a book that has a bunch of Spurrier quotes in it. I think my dad owns it.
|
08-29-2004, 01:20 AM | #34 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Someone actually wrote them down?
I thought they'd just be scribbled in the dirt somewhere along with his ball plays. |
08-29-2004, 04:38 AM | #35 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 277
|
Byner has spoken highly of McCullough, and I think we will keep him. I don't think all the talk about the importance the Redskins place on durability is a smoke screen - I think that betts is going to be traded or cut.
If Betts was the number one backup and then he's out, who is going to be the guy we rely on? Rock is cool, Simon's solid, but are they the guys we want to depend on in crunch time if Portis is out? I think we will rely on McCullough as the top backup. If we do release him, he will be an excellent player for another team and I think we'll regret it. Portis only got 17 carries a game in Denver, and he'll get one third more in DC, but we will still need to spell him, and we will want someone who can do things that look similar - and McCullough's the man for that in my opinion. I expect the Redskins not to look at who was drafted where and will keep McCullough. |
08-29-2004, 06:52 AM | #36 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 389
|
McCullough has done nothing to be kept over the other RB in my oppinion . He has picked up yards mostly against second and third teams. Somone has to do that but because he has not really steped up into the starter role then i think that speeks volumes in terms of his survivability.
|
08-29-2004, 11:10 AM | #37 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Byner has spoken highly of all the backs, but somebody has gotta go
|
08-29-2004, 11:51 AM | #38 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
|
all these guys are comparable in running effectiveness, which is to say just ok, not great. no one stands out except maybe Betts. we should keep the guy who has the best other abilities like pass blocking and catching for 3rd down. if someone is alot better at this than Betts, then we should keep them instead. he's way too unreliable.
|
08-29-2004, 12:10 PM | #39 |
Mr. Brightside
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,453
|
in the end, i think we will be better off with betts as the backup, he played very strong, mccolouch plays against 3rd stringers. PS material at best IMO
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
|
08-29-2004, 12:22 PM | #40 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
mcollough hasn't taken a snap with the first string, and he's a worse version of what portis can do... not only that, portis CAN play every down if needed...
|
08-29-2004, 12:24 PM | #41 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
mcollough also doesn't play gunner/returner, which makes his stay on the skins less likely.
|
08-29-2004, 03:44 PM | #42 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Quote:
|
|
08-29-2004, 04:21 PM | #43 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
simon had a minor injury and was held out as a precaution i heard (shoulder i think)...
|
|
|